Re: Bug#187391: libc0.3-dev: weirdness with sockaddr_un

2003-04-03 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Thu, 03 Apr 2003 20:25:19 +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > At Thu, 3 Apr 2003 03:42:11 +0200, > Robert Millan wrote: > > however, when built with g++ (and not with gcc) on GNU/Hurd, it reports > > mismatch errors: > > > > test.c: In function `int main()

Re: Bug#187391: libc0.3-dev: weirdness with sockaddr_un

2003-04-03 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Thu, 3 Apr 2003 03:42:11 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > the following code seems to be compliant with the Glibc documentation > referred to sockaddr_un, as it provides a char* as the second component > of the struct: > > #include > #include > main () > { > sockaddr_un test = { AF_L

Re: Bug#184573: missing res_search in -lresolv

2003-03-27 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Thu, 27 Mar 2003 09:54:08 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 03:50:00PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > >i.e. "res_search" is only available if the oldest version of glibc for > >that platform was 2.0.x, I believe. > > > >Whether this is standards conformi

Re: Bug#184573: missing res_search in -lresolv

2003-03-27 Thread GOTO Masanori
Ah, I found the problem. It's your miss. At Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:51:05 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > res_search is not present in -lresolv for libc0.3. from an autoconf test: > > $ cat test.c > /* Override any gcc2 internal prototype to avoid an error. */ > /* We use char because int might match

Re: Bug#184573: missing res_search in -lresolv

2003-03-27 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:51:05 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > Package: libc0.3 > Severity: normal Please provide the version information. > res_search is not present in -lresolv for libc0.3. from an autoconf test: > > $ cat test.c > /* Override any gcc2 internal prototype to avoid an error. */