Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> > Things may turn out differently and I may still arrive at the Hurd
> > meeting (being late), but I won't say this is much probable.
>
> Oh, that reminds me. I will probably also be an hour or so late for
> the meeting.
Why not just delay the Hurd meeting 1 hour, or
Stefan Bidigaray wrote:
> PS: Didn't know if this was the right list to post this in or not, it seems
> like the most active.
Yes, this is the right mailing list.
Thanks for the link!
Proposal: Add to the list the below one, as a long term goal.
* The possibility to get a kernel "GPLv3 or later" compatible.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > If you port a driver you should take into account the license such
> > driver use. IMHO the Hurd should go towards full GPLv3 compatibility.
>
> Currently the drivers live in GNU Mach, which is a dependency of the
> actual Hurd, but otherwise they are quite disconnecte
Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> One thing to work on are device drivers. These would most probably be
> ported from another operating system (Linux, *BSD)
If you port a driver you should take into account the license such driver use.
IMHO the Hurd should go towards full GPLv3 compatibility.
The GPLv3
In discussion with William Leslie (verte) in the #hurd IRC channel, the idea
of getting rid of GPLv2 only code was exposed.
A kernel under "GPLv3 or later" would be great. Optionally with some "BSD"
code.
Maybe it could be one of the long-term target of "the Hurd roadmap".
Currently gnumac
