Re: [PATCH mig] Add support for dynamically sized strings

2023-04-28 Thread Flávio Cruz
Hello On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 5:08 AM Sergey Bugaev wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 6:00 AM Flavio Cruz wrote: > > Dynamically sized strings can be represented as c_string[*] (*). We > inline > > up to 64 bytes but can pass arbitrary strings if needed out of line. > Currently > > implementatio

Re: Mach time device, or: I know why the network deadlocks!

2023-04-28 Thread Flávio Cruz
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 7:54 AM Sergey Bugaev wrote: > Hello! > > Here comes yet another bug description and a change proposal; > hopefully not too long this time. (Update after having written like > half of it: apparently it *is* going to be long.) > > My system regularly experiences network dea

Mach time device, or: I know why the network deadlocks!

2023-04-28 Thread Sergey Bugaev
Hello! Here comes yet another bug description and a change proposal; hopefully not too long this time. (Update after having written like half of it: apparently it *is* going to be long.) My system regularly experiences network deadlocks: the system itself still works if I access it through the co

Re: [PATCH mig] Add support for dynamically sized strings

2023-04-28 Thread Samuel Thibault
Sergey Bugaev, le ven. 28 avril 2023 12:08:16 +0300, a ecrit: > (As I understand it, Debian ships old glibc but fresh MIG.) Yes, but I backport whatever patch is needed. Samuel

Re: [PATCH mig] Add support for dynamically sized strings

2023-04-28 Thread Sergey Bugaev
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 6:00 AM Flavio Cruz wrote: > Dynamically sized strings can be represented as c_string[*] (*). We inline > up to 64 bytes but can pass arbitrary strings if needed out of line. Currently > implementation is limited to input arguments only (MiG will error out if > used as outp