On 2020-05-30 2:23 p.m., Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Fixes
>
> exc_request_S.c:177:24: error: no previous declaration for ‘exc_server’
> [-Werror=missing-declarations]
> 177 | mig_external boolean_t exc_server
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> * config/i386/i386gnu.mn [%_S.o %_U.o] (COMPILE.post): Ad
On 2020-05-30 2:04 p.m., Samuel Thibault wrote:
> This allows to have the process_stratum_target object at hand for future use
> in
> the gdb API, and only use gnu_target from external calls.
>
> gdb/Changelog:
>
> * gnu-nat.h (inf_validate_procs, inf_suspend, inf_set_traced,
> steal
Pedro Alves, le sam. 30 mai 2020 20:51:17 +0100, a ecrit:
> On 5/30/20 7:23 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > +++ binutils-gdb/gdb/gnu-nat-mig.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
> > +/* Common things used by the various *gnu-nat.c files
> > + Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> > +
> > + Writt
On 5/30/20 7:23 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> +++ binutils-gdb/gdb/gnu-nat-mig.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
> +/* Common things used by the various *gnu-nat.c files
> + Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> +
> + Written by Samuel Thibault
Please don't take this the wrong way, but a whil
Ok, I pushed this series of 7 patches for now.
Thanks for the reviews,
Samuel
Samuel Thibault, le sam. 30 mai 2020 20:23:18 +0200, a ecrit:
> +boolean_t exc_server (mach_msg_header_t *InHeadP, mach_msg_header_t
> *OutHeadP);
> +boolean_t msg_reply_server (mach_msg_header_t *InHeadP,
> + mach_msg_header_t *OutHeadP)
> +boolean_t notify_server (mach_ms
Fixes
exc_request_S.c:177:24: error: no previous declaration for ‘exc_server’
[-Werror=missing-declarations]
177 | mig_external boolean_t exc_server
gdb/ChangeLog:
* config/i386/i386gnu.mn [%_S.o %_U.o] (COMPILE.post): Add
"-include gnu-nat-mig.h".
* gnu-nat-mig.h: New
This allows to have the process_stratum_target object at hand for future use in
the gdb API, and only use gnu_target from external calls.
gdb/Changelog:
* gnu-nat.h (inf_validate_procs, inf_suspend, inf_set_traced,
steal_exc_port, proc_get_state, inf_clear_wait, inf_cleanup,
On 2020-05-30 12:53, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Simon Marchi, le sam. 30 mai 2020 12:12:24 -0400, a ecrit:
We can either push on your behalf. But if you'd like to have push
access, because
you plan to make regular contributions, you can ask for an account
here, and specify
me as "email address of
Simon Marchi, le sam. 30 mai 2020 12:08:53 -0400, a ecrit:
> On 2020-05-30 11:53 a.m., Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Simon Marchi, le sam. 30 mai 2020 10:57:42 -0400, a ecrit:
> >>> @@ -1106,12 +1109,12 @@ inf_validate_procs (struct inf *inf)
> >>> if (inferior_ptid == ptid_t (inf->pid))
> >>>
Simon Marchi, le sam. 30 mai 2020 12:12:24 -0400, a ecrit:
> We can either push on your behalf. But if you'd like to have push access,
> because
> you plan to make regular contributions, you can ask for an account here, and
> specify
> me as "email address of person who approved request".
>
>
On 2020-05-30 12:00 p.m., Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Simon Marchi, le sam. 30 mai 2020 10:39:19 -0400, a ecrit:
>> On 2020-05-29 6:00 p.m., Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> Fixes
>>>
>>> ../../gdb/gnu-nat.c:96:6: error: conflicting declaration ‘bool
>>> gnu_debug_flag’
>>>96 | bool gnu_debug_flag = fa
On 2020-05-30 11:53 a.m., Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Simon Marchi, le sam. 30 mai 2020 10:57:42 -0400, a ecrit:
>>> @@ -1106,12 +1109,12 @@ inf_validate_procs (struct inf *inf)
>>> if (inferior_ptid == ptid_t (inf->pid))
>>> /* This is the first time we're hearing about thread
>>>
On 2020-05-30 11:32 a.m., Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Simon Marchi, le sam. 30 mai 2020 10:47:50 -0400, a ecrit:
>> On 2020-05-29 6:01 p.m., Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> process_reply_S.c:104:23: error: function called through a non-compatible
>>> type [-Werror]
>>> 104 | OutP->RetCode = (*(kern
Simon Marchi, le sam. 30 mai 2020 10:39:19 -0400, a ecrit:
> On 2020-05-29 6:00 p.m., Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Fixes
> >
> > ../../gdb/gnu-nat.c:96:6: error: conflicting declaration ‘bool
> > gnu_debug_flag’
> >96 | bool gnu_debug_flag = false;
> > ../../gdb/gnu-nat.c: In function ‘void _in
Simon Marchi, le sam. 30 mai 2020 10:57:42 -0400, a ecrit:
> > @@ -1106,12 +1109,12 @@ inf_validate_procs (struct inf *inf)
> > if (inferior_ptid == ptid_t (inf->pid))
> > /* This is the first time we're hearing about thread
> > ids, after a fork-child. */
> > -
Simon Marchi, le sam. 30 mai 2020 10:47:50 -0400, a ecrit:
> On 2020-05-29 6:01 p.m., Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > process_reply_S.c:104:23: error: function called through a non-compatible
> > type [-Werror]
> > 104 | OutP->RetCode = (*(kern_return_t (*)(mach_port_t,
> > kern_return_t)) S_pr
On 2020-05-29 7:00 p.m., Samuel Thibault wrote:
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> 2020-05-29 Samuel Thibault
>
> * i386-gnu-tdep.c: Include "gdbcore.h"
> (gnu_sigtramp_code, i386_gnu_sc_reg_offset): New arrays.
> (GNU_SIGTRAMP_LEN, GNU_SIGTRAMP_TAIL,
> I386_GNU_SIGCONTEXT_THREAD
On 2020-05-29 6:04 p.m., Samuel Thibault wrote:
> This fixes creating inferiors, which was broken since 5b6d1e4fa
> ('Multi-target support')
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> 2020-05-29 Samuel Thibault
>
> * gnu-nat.c (gnu_nat_target::create_inferior): Move push_target call
> before fork_in
On 2020-05-29 6:03 p.m., Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Fixes
>
> ../../gdb/gnu-nat.c:1110:28: error: cannot convert ‘ptid_t’ to
> ‘process_stratum_target*’
> 1110 |thread_change_ptid (inferior_ptid, ptid);
>
> and others related to 5b6d1e4fa ("Multi-target support")
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
>
On 2020-05-29 6:03 p.m., Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Fixes
>
> ../../gdb/gnu-nat.c:2554:7: error: unused variable ‘res’
> [-Werror=unused-variable]
> 2554 | int res;
> ../../gdb/gnu-nat.c:2644:20: error: unused variable ‘old_address’
> [-Werror=unused-variable]
> 2644 | vm_address_t old_a
On 2020-05-29 6:02 p.m., Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Fixes
>
> ../../gdb/gnu-nat.c:2522:14: error: ‘target_gdbarch’ was not declared in this
> scope; did you mean ‘target_detach’?
> 2522 |paddress (target_gdbarch (), memaddr), pulongest (len),
>
> gdb/Changelog:
>
> 2020-05-29 Samuel Thibaul
On 2020-05-29 6:01 p.m., Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Fixes
>
> process_reply_S.c:104:23: error: function called through a non-compatible
> type [-Werror]
> 104 | OutP->RetCode = (*(kern_return_t (*)(mach_port_t,
> kern_return_t)) S_proc_setmsgport_reply) (In0P->Head.msgh_request_port, In0P-
On 2020-05-29 6:01 p.m., Samuel Thibault wrote:
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> 2020-05-29 Samuel Thibault
>
> * config/i386/i386gnu.mn (%_reply_S.c): Add dependency on
> $(srcdir)/reply_mig_hack.awk.
>
> diff --git a/gdb/config/i386/i386gnu.mn b/gdb/config/i386/i386gnu.mn
> index 1c3453823d
On 2020-05-29 6:00 p.m., Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Fixes
>
> ../../gdb/gnu-nat.c:96:6: error: conflicting declaration ‘bool gnu_debug_flag’
>96 | bool gnu_debug_flag = false;
> ../../gdb/gnu-nat.c: In function ‘void _initialize_gnu_nat()’:
> ../../gdb/gnu-nat.c:3511:7: error: cannot
>
> gdb/Ch
25 matches
Mail list logo
