Samuel Thibault, le lun. 11 nov. 2019 19:06:21 +0100, a ecrit:
> Justus Winter, le lun. 11 nov. 2019 19:03:46 +0100, a ecrit:
> > I remember thinking about using a send-once right that when deallocated
> > enables the interrupt again. This should be a) well optimized, and b)
> > robust in the face
Justus Winter, le lun. 11 nov. 2019 19:03:46 +0100, a ecrit:
> I remember thinking about using a send-once right that when deallocated
> enables the interrupt again. This should be a) well optimized, and b)
> robust in the face of misbehaving userland.
I was thinking about something like that to
Samuel Thibault writes:
> A simpler way for now would be to make deliver_intr and
> device_intr_enable count how many "disables" we have for each irq.
> Both device_intr_register and deliver_intr would increase it (and thus
> disable the irq), and userland would have to call device_intr_enable
>
Samuel Thibault, le lun. 11 nov. 2019 17:52:36 +0100, a ecrit:
> That being said, now netdde with e1000 works only because linux_intr
> calls disable_irq before queue_intr. If that is not done, we keep
> getting interrupts. This really looks like an edge-vs-level trigger
> issue which we need to cl
Damien Zammit, le lun. 11 nov. 2019 21:23:15 +1100, a ecrit:
> On 11/11/19 3:08 am, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Samuel Thibault, le dim. 10 nov. 2019 16:25:22 +0100, a ecrit:
> >> Samuel Thibault, le dim. 10 nov. 2019 16:22:04 +0100, a ecrit:
> >>> Ok, I have restored some of the mask/unmask_irq, so
On 11/11/19 3:08 am, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le dim. 10 nov. 2019 16:25:22 +0100, a ecrit:
>> Samuel Thibault, le dim. 10 nov. 2019 16:22:04 +0100, a ecrit:
>>> Ok, I have restored some of the mask/unmask_irq, so that curr_pic_mask
>>> will still exist, but without the notion of s
