Hello,
Svante Signell, on jeu. 07 sept. 2017 10:38:19 +0200, wrote:
> When working on porting gccgo to gcc-7, I found out that many test failures
> are
> due to a bug in Hurd's implementation of /proc/self/exe (and /proc//exe):
> The path returned should always be absolute, not relative.
That g
On 09/06/2017 11:11 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Pedro Alves, on lun. 04 sept. 2017 13:14:33 +0100, wrote:
>> On 08/27/2017 07:41 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> Since hurd's baf7e5c ('hurd: Use polymorphic port types to return some
>>> rights.'), some RPCs prototypes have changed, gdb needs the
>>
Hi,
When working on porting gccgo to gcc-7, I found out that many test failures are
due to a bug in Hurd's implementation of /proc/self/exe (and /proc//exe):
The path returned should always be absolute, not relative.
Adding print statements to libbacktrace/posix.c shows the problem:
GNU/Linux:
.
