Re: Hurd port for gcc go PATCH 1-4(23)

Hello, Nice work! Mmm, why making changes in each file in a separate patch? I don't think it makes things easier to review, I'd say rather send a big patch, it's altogether that it makes sense anyway. > Index: gcc-6-6.2.1-4.1/src/libgo/Makefile.in > =

Re: C++ vs. glibc/Hurd/Mach headers

Hi! On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 13:36:22 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Thomas Schwinge, on Fri 25 Nov 2016 12:46:33 +0100, wrote: > > Additionally to the issues Samuel pointed > > out in > > (still unresolved), > > ? > > I can include

Re: gdb handling of Mach exceptions

"Brent W. Baccala" writes: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:03 PM, Brent W. Baccala > wrote: > >> >> Any comments? >> > > Well, yes, actually. :-) > > gdb's hurd target has a poorly documented command "set noninvasive". I > don't completely understand it, but... gdb in noninvasive mode does not s

Re: C++ vs. glibc/Hurd/Mach headers

Thomas Schwinge, on Fri 25 Nov 2016 12:46:33 +0100, wrote: > Additionally to the issues Samuel pointed > out in > (still unresolved), ? I can include hurd/signal.h fine from c++. The second part of my patch was applied, and IIRC we