Justus Winter, on Sun 02 Oct 2016 18:54:05 +0200, wrote:
> I'm afraid there haven't been any commits for MIG. Does anyone have a
> patch for it?
Actually I had an unpushed typo patch :)
But I have also pushed the proposed fix for the
MACH_MSG_TYPE_POLYMORPHIC warning.
Samuel
Samuel Thibault, on Mon 10 Oct 2016 21:47:47 +0200, wrote:
> In Debian we build with build-mathvec = no
FYI I've been testing with
../configure --host=i586-gnu --build=i586-gnu --prefix=/usr
--enable-add-ons=libidn,"libpthread " --enable-pt_chown --disable-nscd
CFLAGS="-O2 -g" --disable-werror
David Michael, on Mon 10 Oct 2016 12:44:32 -0700, wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Samuel Thibault
> wrote:
> > Samuel Thibault, on Tue 04 Oct 2016 16:45:36 +0200, wrote:
> >> Ludovic Courtès, on Tue 04 Oct 2016 15:22:32 +0200, wrote:
> >> > FWIW Guix follows upstream glibc releases for G
On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, on Tue 04 Oct 2016 16:45:36 +0200, wrote:
>> Ludovic Courtès, on Tue 04 Oct 2016 15:22:32 +0200, wrote:
>> > FWIW Guix follows upstream glibc releases for GNU/Linux (we’re currently
>> > in the process of switching from 2.23
Samuel Thibault, on Mon 10 Oct 2016 16:10:40 +0200, wrote:
> Manolis Ragkousis, on Mon 10 Oct 2016 17:07:52 +0300, wrote:
> > /tmp/guix-build-glibc-cross-i586-pc-gnu-2.23.drv-0/build/mach/RPC_register_new_task_notification.c:
> > In function ?__register_new_task_notification?:
> > /tmp/guix-build-
Manolis Ragkousis, on Mon 10 Oct 2016 17:07:52 +0300, wrote:
> /tmp/guix-build-glibc-cross-i586-pc-gnu-2.23.drv-0/build/mach/RPC_register_new_task_notification.c:
> In function ?__register_new_task_notification?:
> /tmp/guix-build-glibc-cross-i586-pc-gnu-2.23.drv-0/build/mach/RPC_register_new_task
Hello Ludo, Hello Samuel
I am currently trying to build the latest tschwinge/Roger_Whittaker
with Guix and it fails with
/tmp/guix-build-glibc-cross-i586-pc-gnu-2.23.drv-0/build/mach/RPC_register_new_task_notification.c:
In function ?__register_new_task_notification?:
/tmp/guix-build-glibc-cros
Ludovic Courtès, on Mon 10 Oct 2016 10:02:36 +0200, wrote:
> Samuel Thibault skribis:
> > Ludovic Courtès, on Tue 04 Oct 2016 15:22:32 +0200, wrote:
> >> > Yes, but our current glibc tree is based on glibc 2.22, as guix needs
> >> > it.
> >>
> >> FWIW Guix follows upstream glibc releases for GNU/
Samuel Thibault skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès, on Tue 04 Oct 2016 15:22:32 +0200, wrote:
>> > Yes, but our current glibc tree is based on glibc 2.22, as guix needs
>> > it.
>>
>> FWIW Guix follows upstream glibc releases for GNU/Linux (we’re currently
>> in the process of switching from 2.23 to 2.2
