Hello, Samuel,
On 04/17/2016 12:24 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Hello,
Ok, but why not just fixing pthread_mutex_lock & such in our current
libpthread, instead of having yet another implementation? How are we
supposed to handle those three implementations: Neal's, nptl, and yours?
Ideally your
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 02:04:26AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I'm not saying we should revert the work :)
>
> I'm saying I'm reverting it to work around the issue on buildds for now.
> Perhaps we can also apply the revert on the debian package.
No I understand, I just want to make this clear
Richard Braun, on Mon 18 Apr 2016 01:29:13 +0200, wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 10:24:32PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Looking at ps -feMj, it seems that it's ext2fs which consumes much more
> > CPU time, thus increasing overall wallclock time. It'd probably be
> > interesting to profile e
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 10:24:32PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Thanks for the investigation. I have added the attached patch to the
> gnumach running on the buildds. That'll revert to the old page cache
> policy, which seems to be reverting to the previous performance.
>
> Looking at ps -feMj
Hello,
Here's another update on this issue.
It was very tricky to find what was going on in the loader because
at the point of failure the backtrace produced by GDB was not
complete. (not to mention the first ones were nonsense)
Samuel, you were right in suggesting a long recursion. :)
Even tho
Hello,
Thanks for the investigation. I have added the attached patch to the
gnumach running on the buildds. That'll revert to the old page cache
policy, which seems to be reverting to the previous performance.
Looking at ps -feMj, it seems that it's ext2fs which consumes much more
CPU time, thus
Hello,
Agustina Arzille, on Fri 15 Apr 2016 15:13:49 -0300, wrote:
> On 2016-04-15 15:01, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >Ah, this is yet another libpthread? We need to converge on one
> >implementation. There was also a proposal to just adapt nptl to Mach,
> >which is probably possible now with gsync
