Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support

2016-03-13 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Svante Signell, on Sun 13 Mar 2016 14:19:35 +0100, wrote: > Running the code reveals that the current implementation in glibc is buggy: > > ./scm_rights+creds_recv > Number of SCM_RIGHTS [<=3], SCM_CREDS [<=2]: [1,1]  > Input error: Using defaults:  > NRIGHTS = 1, NCREDS = 1 > scm_rights+c

Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support

2016-03-13 Thread Svante Signell
On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 20:28 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Samuel Thibault, le Sun 20 Sep 2015 13:17:36 +0200, a écrit : > > I'll have a stab at cleaning your patches. > > I have pushed the result on the t/sendmsg-SCM_CREDS branch.  Note that I > have refactored the t/sendmsg-SCM_RIGHTS branch, s

Re: Testing requested for the next version of GNU Mach

2016-03-13 Thread Richard Braun
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 05:38:06PM -0500, David Michael wrote: > I didn't get a chance to try with Debian yet, but after looking a bit > more, the failure I'm getting is from linux_kmem_init() allocating > memory. It panics in vm_page_grab_contig() when allocating the 29th > (i=28) chunk. This me

Re: GSoC 2016 proposal

2016-03-13 Thread Richard Braun
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 11:40:45AM +, Vasantha Ganesh K wrote: > Hello Braun, >   Thanks for your attention. I'll tone the next draft down and make it a > little more formal. No you didn't get it. I was meaning that your enthusiasm makes you say plain wrong things like "the Hurd can scale wel