Samuel Thibault, on Thu 25 Feb 2016 00:18:21 +0100, wrote:
> Thomas Schwinge, on Wed 24 Feb 2016 23:46:36 +0100, wrote:
> > I guess getting -D_REENTRANT for -pthread won't do us any harm?
>
> It won't.
(Actually we've been using this in Debian for a long time).
Samuel
Thomas Schwinge, on Thu 25 Feb 2016 15:05:21 +0100, wrote:
> Should we move the initialization of profil_reply_port elsewhere, or be
> prepared for profil_reply_port to be MACH_PORT_NULL in
> sysdeps/mach/hurd/profil.c:fetch_samples (by returning early?), or not
> call fetch_samples from sysdeps/ma
Hi!
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 23:46:36 +0100, I wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 14:00:23 +0200, Samuel Thibault
> wrote:
> > On Linux, -p and -pg do not make gcc link against libc_p.a, only
> > -profile does (as documented in r11246), and thus people expect -p
>
> (Yo, 20 years ago...)
Now looking at g
Svante Signell, on Thu 25 Feb 2016 10:16:59 +0100, wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 23:33 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, on Mon 08 Feb 2016 12:51:42 +0100, wrote:
> > > 1) Locks are inherited by fork, they should not. Test program: libfshelp-
> > > tests/fork.c
> >
> > As I mentio
On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 23:33 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, on Mon 08 Feb 2016 12:51:42 +0100, wrote:
> > 1) Locks are inherited by fork, they should not. Test program: libfshelp-
> > tests/fork.c
>
> As I mentioned previously, this should be fine for now.
>
> > 2) The pid of a co
