Svante Signell, on Thu 05 Nov 2015 11:02:07 +0100, wrote:
> Unfortunately some values are wrong for GNU/Hurd. In order to hardcode
> them (to see if the application packages like maxima can run properly)
> I need to know the correct/safe (maybe empirical) values.
>
> On Hurd:
> page_width=12
> sta
On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 10:43 +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
> On Thursday 05 November 2015 10:30:27 Svante Signell wrote:
> >
> > + mach_port_t port = __hurd_local_reply_port;
> > + if (port == MACH_PORT_NULL ||
> > + (&__hurd_local_reply_port != &__hurd_reply_port0 &&
> > + port == __hurd
Hi,
gcl use the attached program, extracted from configure.in, to
calculate mem_top, mem_range, stack_address, stack_direction and
page_width for that package. (Unfortunately I don't understand parts of
the code)
Unfortunately some values are wrong for GNU/Hurd. In order to hardcode
them (to see
On Thursday 05 November 2015 10:30:27 Svante Signell wrote:
> I agree, the #if 1 part was not OK. What about rewriting
> __mig_get_reply_port() too to be more readable?
>
> Please tell me if this patch is faulty in some way, I'm still on the
> learning curve.
>
> Index: glibc-2.19/sysdeps/mach/hu
On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 22:34 -0300, Diego Nieto Cid wrote:
>
> 2015-11-04 16:03 GMT-03:00 Svante Signell :
> > On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 18:57 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Diego Nieto Cid, on Wed 04 Nov 2015 10:50:35 -0300, wrote:
> > > > assert (__hurd_local_reply_port == arg || arg ==
> MACH
