Olaf Buddenhagen, le Sat 26 Sep 2015 14:48:07 +0200, a écrit :
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 09:30:17AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Olaf Buddenhagen, le Thu 24 Sep 2015 00:11:26 +0200, a écrit :
>
> > > As I already mentioned on IRC, I don't think we should emulate Mach
> > > device nodes at all
Olaf Buddenhagen, le Sat 26 Sep 2015 15:08:15 +0200, a écrit :
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 08:18:37PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > It may still be impossible at the moment actually. The
> > SNDCTL_DSP_MAPINBUF and SNDCTL_DSP_MAPOUTBUF ioctls are precisely
> > examples: they pass a struct whi
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 01:52:25PM -0400, Joshua Branson wrote:
> diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
> deleted file mode 100644
Not sure what happened to your .gitignore -- but you definitely don't
want this in the patch :-)
> +Note that it is impossible to share microkernel devices betwe
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 09:30:17AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Olaf Buddenhagen, le Thu 24 Sep 2015 00:11:26 +0200, a écrit :
> > As I already mentioned on IRC, I don't think we should emulate Mach
> > device nodes at all here. Rather, the USB mass storage server(s) would
> > export UNIX
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 08:18:37PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> It may still be impossible at the moment actually. The
> SNDCTL_DSP_MAPINBUF and SNDCTL_DSP_MAPOUTBUF ioctls are precisely
> examples: they pass a struct which contains the address of a buffer.
> This can not be expressed wit
