Re: Question with moving mount/umount logic in glibc

2015-07-09 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Roland McGrath skribis: > Frankly I think it would be better to keep these single-caller interfaces > out of libc proper. It's not really ideal that they are there for Linux > either, but syscall stubs are less of an issue than real code. While not ideal, I think it would greatly simplify porti

Re: Question with moving mount/umount logic in glibc

2015-07-09 Thread Roland McGrath
Frankly I think it would be better to keep these single-caller interfaces out of libc proper. It's not really ideal that they are there for Linux either, but syscall stubs are less of an issue than real code.

Re: [PATCH] limited support for non-root mlock()

2015-07-09 Thread Justus Winter
Quoting Samuel Thibault (2015-07-08 18:22:56) > Justus Winter, le Wed 08 Jul 2015 16:22:28 +0200, a écrit : > > Alternatively, you could re-purpose the existing RPC `vm_wire', > > changing the type of its first argument from `host_priv_t' to `host_t' > > (this is backwards compatible as the privile