> Roland McGrath, le Wed 18 Feb 2015 16:40:06 -0800, a ?crit :
> > The short answer is that it's pretty well hopeless.
>
> Ok, that's what I was feeling, thanks for the confirmation :)
Note this also means that features like dynamic linker namespaces and audit
modules are essentially unusable on
Indeed the purpose is to avoid the overhead of many processes that are all
nearly identical. Obviously there is some sacrifice of the traditional
compartmentalization that the whole multi-server model gives you. So it's
wise to use it for translators that are relatively simple and thus
relatively
Roland McGrath, le Wed 18 Feb 2015 16:40:06 -0800, a écrit :
> The short answer is that it's pretty well hopeless.
Ok, that's what I was feeling, thanks for the confirmation :)
Samuel
The short answer is that it's pretty well hopeless. For the Hurd you
really really do not want to use static linking. Because of the structure
of the system, it's much like having a quarter or third of the Linux kernel
baked into each application binary.
On Linux and other Unix-like systems, we
