Samuel Thibault, le Sun 14 Dec 2014 17:59:24 +0100, a écrit :
> Richard Braun, le Sun 14 Dec 2014 15:44:44 +0100, a écrit :
> > If the critical sections protected by this lock are all small enough,
> > granularity tends to matter much less. My point being that this could
> > be generalized for all
Richard Braun, le Sun 14 Dec 2014 15:44:44 +0100, a écrit :
> If the critical sections protected by this lock are all small enough,
> granularity tends to matter much less. My point being that this could
> be generalized for all IPLs,
Yes, but investigation is needed to make sure that the protecte
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 03:44:44PM +0100, Richard Braun wrote:
> No, and in fact, I don't like the idea of SPL/IPL. For example, Linux
> doesn't care about them and merely disables or enables interrupts at
> the processor level, the semantics being all or nothing, and it shows
> it works quite well
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 02:44:08AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Does anybody with a bit of background with spl (I guess Richard?) see
> any red flag here?
No, and in fact, I don't like the idea of SPL/IPL. For example, Linux
doesn't care about them and merely disables or enables interrupts at
t
