Hi Roland :)
Quoting David Michael (2014-09-18 23:14:17)
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Justus Winter
> <4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
> > Bind the startup server to /servers/startup instead. Use this to
> > contact the startup server.
>
> I'm trying to test this patch, and glibc
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 16 Oct 2014 01:07:13 +0200, a écrit :
> Does the puts() call return some error?
I mean perhaps _IO_puts stops early because _IO_vtable_offset or
_IO_fwide() fail.
Samuel
Does the puts() call return some error?
Justus Winter, le Wed 15 Oct 2014 16:46:50 +0200, a écrit :
> So, startup calls setbuf while libdiskfs does not.
Does libdiskfs really do some puts that is working?
> Also, startup only passes D_WRITE to device_open, while libdiskfs uses
> D_READ|D_WRITE.
Hello,
there is a strange bug in puts(3) affecting /hurd/init (or
/hurd/startup if you live on the edge). It is also sometimes
affecting printf(3), as it is replaced by gcc with a call to puts
under certain conditions (e.g. with a format string ending in '\n'
without any conversion specifiers).
Svante Signell, le Wed 15 Oct 2014 10:56:41 +0200, a écrit :
> On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 10:06 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Wed 15 Oct 2014 09:57:21 +0200, a écrit :
> > > See also https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/10/msg00201.html for
> > > a discussion on the topic.
>
On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 10:06 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 15 Oct 2014 09:57:21 +0200, a écrit :
> > See also https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/10/msg00201.html for
> > a discussion on the topic.
>
> I can't understand why you proposed to use setuid in order to kee
Samuel Thibault, le Wed 15 Oct 2014 10:06:33 +0200, a écrit :
> The amount of such locked memory shall however be accounted and
> limited. The default on my Linux system is 64KB.
And it should be configurable per-process through ulimit -l.
Samuel
Svante Signell, le Wed 15 Oct 2014 09:57:21 +0200, a écrit :
> See also https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/10/msg00201.html for
> a discussion on the topic.
I can't understand why you proposed to use setuid in order to keep
secrets, but oh well.
To get mlock available to user should be a
On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 09:52 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently libgnome-keyring and gnome-keyring secmem related tests fail,
> falling back to mlock/munlock requiring root permissions to lock
> memory.
> In the code we have:
> err = __get_privileged_ports (&hostpriv, NULL);
> if
Hi,
Currently libgnome-keyring and gnome-keyring secmem related tests fail,
falling back to mlock/munlock requiring root permissions to lock
memory.
In the code we have:
err = __get_privileged_ports (&hostpriv, NULL);
if (err)
return __hurd_fail (EPERM);
How to make mock/munlock availabl
10 matches
Mail list logo
