On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Justus Winter
<4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
> Quoting Gabriele Giacone (2014-06-15 12:56:13)
>> >> Such hunks are workarounds at the moment because hurd mounts paths by
>> >> keeping superfluous '/' and '.' in pathnames if specified at mount
>> >> time,
Quoting Gabriele Giacone (2014-06-15 12:56:13)
> >> Such hunks are workarounds at the moment because hurd mounts paths by
> >> keeping superfluous '/' and '.' in pathnames if specified at mount
> >> time, which need to be specified at umount time as well to umount
> >> successfully.
> >
> > But the
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Samuel Thibault
wrote:
> Gabriele Giacone, le Sun 15 Jun 2014 02:23:49 +0200, a écrit :
>> On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Samuel Thibault
>> wrote:
>> I thought it was already detailed enough: first and last hunks useless
>> if patch is applied are:
>
> That's o
