Hi,
Samuel Thibault wrote:
Do you have HWCLOCKACCESS enabled in /etc/default/hwclock and rcS?
Otherwise I don't see how a BIOS manages to let an OS disturb its RTC...
The line is commented out.
# Set this to yes if it is possible to access the hardware clock,
# or no if it is not.
#HWCLOCKACCE
Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 14:13:54 +0200, a écrit :
> > > +# Special treatment of EWOULDBLOCK for GNU/Hurd
> > > +# /usr/include/bits/errno.h: #define EWOULDBLOCK EAGAIN
> > > +egrep '^const EWOULDBLOCK = Errno(_EWOULDBLOCK)' ${OUT} | \
> > > +sed -i.bak -e 's/_EWOULDBLOCK/_EAGAIN/' ${
Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 15:25:38 +0200, a écrit :
> On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 15:07 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 15:05:20 +0200, a écrit :
> > > On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 14:51 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > Just to explicitly ask for it:
> > > >
>
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 15:07 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 15:05:20 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 14:51 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Just to explicitly ask for it:
> > >
> > > Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 10:06:49 +0200, a écrit :
> > >
Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 15:05:20 +0200, a écrit :
> On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 14:51 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Just to explicitly ask for it:
> >
> > Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 10:06:49 +0200, a écrit :
> > > For some (yet) unknown reason all libgo tests fails with a segfault
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 14:51 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Just to explicitly ask for it:
>
> Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 10:06:49 +0200, a écrit :
> > For some (yet) unknown reason all libgo tests fails with a segfault when
> > run in the build tree: make, sh or something else, the test c
Just to explicitly ask for it:
Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 10:06:49 +0200, a écrit :
> For some (yet) unknown reason all libgo tests fails with a segfault when
> run in the build tree: make, sh or something else, the test commands are
> rather hard to track.
Doesn't that dump a core? Do y
Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 14:33:18 +0200, a écrit :
> On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 14:25 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 14:13:54 +0200, a écrit :
> > > And you wrote in your reply to the above: see e.g.
> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00644
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 14:25 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 14:13:54 +0200, a écrit :
> > And you wrote in your reply to the above: see e.g.
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00644.html
> > > These should be fine, however.
>
> "These" here meant as
Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 14:13:54 +0200, a écrit :
> And you wrote in your reply to the above: see e.g.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00644.html
> > These should be fine, however.
"These" here meant as: "what is below", not "what is above".
Samuel
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 11:07 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 10:58:38 +0200, a écrit :
> > The patch for st_dev by Thomas Schwinge was not liked by Samuel
>
> Uh?
>
> I said “These should be fine, however.” and “a sed rule can't hurt even
> if there is no occurre
Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 10:58:38 +0200, a écrit :
> The patch for st_dev by Thomas Schwinge was not liked by Samuel
Uh?
I said “These should be fine, however.” and “a sed rule can't hurt even
if there is no occurrence...”
So just keep that precise part back as it was, no need for bein
(continued)
patch7.diff: src/libgo/go/syscall/wait.c
Set WCONTINUED to zero if not defined (same fix as for lto in gcc-4.9)
patch8.diff: src/libgo/mksysinfo.sh
Add special treatment of EWOULDBLOCK, SYS_FCNTL and st_dev since they
are either not defined or defined differently for the script to ca
(continued)
patch4.diff: src/libgo/go/syscall/libcall_posix-1.go: New file, a copy
of libcall_posix.go with the mount, mlockall and munlockall calls
removed. mount/umount functionality exists but is currently part of
Hurd utilities, the outhe two functions are not yet implemented.
patch5.diff: s
Hi,
Attached are patches to enable gccgo to build properly on Debian
GNU/Hurd on gcc-4.9 (4.9-4.9.0-1). With split stack enabled 95 libgo
tests PASS and 27 FAIL. Many of the failed tests do fail only in a few
sub-tests. patch0.diff is debian specific, while the rest are for
upstream.
patch0.diff
On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 12:52 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Fri 02 May 2014 12:45:56 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 12:00 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Samuel Thibault, le Fri 02 May 2014 11:57:53 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > So we just need to fix guardsize in our
16 matches
Mail list logo
