Svante Signell, le Wed 16 Oct 2013 11:26:29 +0200, a écrit :
> > All of them. Everything that is provided in cmsgcred is supposed to have
> > been checked by the operating system as being correct.
>
> How to handle case where not all ancillary data is sent, e.g. groups
> missing?
Well, you can st
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 10:46 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 16 Oct 2013 09:50:27 +0200, a écrit :
>
> Also, you need to check that it works when the sender and the receiver
> don't have the same uid/gid/etc., e.g. root sending to a normal user
> (which is one of the most us
Svante Signell, le Wed 16 Oct 2013 09:50:27 +0200, a écrit :
>
> On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 09:24 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Wed 16 Oct 2013 07:44:11 +0200, a écrit :
> > > What about being paranoid, and do the check on both the transmit _and_
> > > receive side?
> >
> > Ther
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 09:24 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 16 Oct 2013 07:44:11 +0200, a écrit :
> > What about being paranoid, and do the check on both the transmit _and_
> > receive side?
>
> There is no need for a check on the transmit side: the sender does know
> for s
Svante Signell, le Wed 16 Oct 2013 07:35:51 +0200, a écrit :
> OK, I'll move the check to recvmsg.c then. No problem:) We can also do a
> full re-authentication at the receive end, should that be added too?
I don't remember what that means, but you might need that.
In any case, you should really
Svante Signell, le Wed 16 Oct 2013 07:44:11 +0200, a écrit :
> What about being paranoid, and do the check on both the transmit _and_
> receive side?
There is no need for a check on the transmit side: the sender does know
for sure what he is.
Samuel
Hi!
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 23:36:16 +0200, Samuel Thibault
wrote:
> Abhinav Jangda, le Tue 15 Oct 2013 17:09:53 +0530, a écrit :
> > Yeah, that is what I did. And I am saw the code of ipc_port.c and some of
> > the
> > code is of even old K&R C. I did the changes, after that what to do?
> > Create
