On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 07:35 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 00:49 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Samuel Thibault, le Wed 16 Oct 2013 00:48:35 +0200, a écrit :
> > > Because the receiver does not trust the sender.
> >
> > And that is the *whole* point of SCM_CREDS. Otherwise
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 00:49 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le Wed 16 Oct 2013 00:48:35 +0200, a écrit :
> > Because the receiver does not trust the sender.
>
> And that is the *whole* point of SCM_CREDS. Otherwise the sender could
> simply write a mere struct, without having to g
Samuel Thibault, le Wed 16 Oct 2013 00:48:35 +0200, a écrit :
> Because the receiver does not trust the sender.
And that is the *whole* point of SCM_CREDS. Otherwise the sender could
simply write a mere struct, without having to go through SCM_*.
Samuel
Svante Signell, le Wed 16 Oct 2013 00:46:54 +0200, a écrit :
> On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 00:42 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Wed 16 Oct 2013 00:40:18 +0200, a écrit :
> > > On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 00:28 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > Svante Signell, le Tue 15 Oct 2013 10:33:
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 00:42 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 16 Oct 2013 00:40:18 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 00:28 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Svante Signell, le Tue 15 Oct 2013 10:33:12 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > + pids = __getpid();
> > > > +
Svante Signell, le Wed 16 Oct 2013 00:40:18 +0200, a écrit :
> On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 00:28 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Tue 15 Oct 2013 10:33:12 +0200, a écrit :
> > > + pids = __getpid();
> > > + euids = __geteuid();
> > > + auids = __getuid();
> > > + egids = __get
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 00:28 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Tue 15 Oct 2013 10:33:12 +0200, a écrit :
> > + pids = __getpid();
> > + euids = __geteuid();
> > + auids = __getuid();
> > + egids = __getegid();
> > + agids = __getgid();
>
> Err, which part of the
Svante Signell, le Tue 15 Oct 2013 10:33:12 +0200, a écrit :
> + pids = __getpid();
> + euids = __geteuid();
> + auids = __getuid();
> + egids = __getegid();
> + agids = __getgid();
Err, which part of the protocol which check that these are actually the
proper value?
Abhinav Jangda, le Tue 15 Oct 2013 17:09:53 +0530, a écrit :
> Yeah, that is what I did. And I am saw the code of ipc_port.c and some of the
> code is of even old K&R C. I did the changes, after that what to do?
> Create a patch and submit it on a bug report or create a pull request?
Either of tho
Thanks for reply.
> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 23:44:16 +0200
> From: rbr...@sceen.net
> To: abhijan...@hotmail.com
> CC: bug-hurd@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Novice Contributor
>
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:27:24PM +0530, Abhinav Jangda wrote:
> > I want to contribute to GNU Hurd, I saw this years GSoC
Updated second patch, reflecting recent changes in the first patch.
On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 10:36 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Patch 2(2) on SCM_CREDS support for GNU/Hurd.
>
> This patch is optional. kFreeBSD dos not support this case (but Linux
> is).
>
> This patch implements the las
Hi,
Patch 2(2) on SCM_CREDS support for GNU/Hurd.
This patch is optional. kFreeBSD dos not support this case (but Linux
is).
This patch implements the last cases in the test code sent to the list
in September 2013, options <-n> and <-z> see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-hurd/2013/09/msg00034.ht
Hi,
Patch 1(2) on SCM_CREDS support for GNU/Hurd.
Time to publish the SCM_CREDS proposal to the list. From the patch there
are some FIXMEs that need to be resolved for a final patch to be
created. I've been running two kvm-images with eglibc built with this
patch for a few weeks now, and haven't
13 matches
Mail list logo
