Re: kdb and optimizations

Hi! On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 00:13:16 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Thomas Schwinge, le Mon 08 Apr 2013 00:06:23 +0200, a écrit : > > On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 21:10:09 +0200, Samuel Thibault > > wrote: > > > In the Debian package, when building the kdb-enabled kernel, > > > we pass -fno-omit-frame-point

Re: kdb and optimizations

Thomas Schwinge, le Mon 08 Apr 2013 00:06:23 +0200, a écrit : > On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 21:10:09 +0200, Samuel Thibault > wrote: > > In the Debian package, when building the kdb-enabled kernel, > > we pass -fno-omit-frame-pointer in CFLAGS, and I'll push > > -fno-optimize-sibling-calls too. Both of th

Re: kdb and optimizations

Hi! On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 21:10:09 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > In the Debian package, when building the kdb-enabled kernel, > we pass -fno-omit-frame-pointer in CFLAGS, and I'll push > -fno-optimize-sibling-calls too. Both of them permit to get useful call > traces in kdb. They should rather be

kdb and optimizations

Hello, In the Debian package, when building the kdb-enabled kernel, we pass -fno-omit-frame-pointer in CFLAGS, and I'll push -fno-optimize-sibling-calls too. Both of them permit to get useful call traces in kdb. They should rather be included in the upstream configfrag.ac, don't they? Samuel

Re: Project idea link on the wiki

Hi! On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:12:07 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Richard Braun, le Tue 26 Mar 2013 16:03:05 +0100, a écrit : > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:53:01PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > > Yep, as soon as the GSoC is actually running and we have polished our > > > project ideas page s

GSoC 2013 project idea: Improve the GDB Port for GNU Hurd

Hi! Assuming that the GNU project will again be accepted as a mentoring organization for the Google Summer of Code 2013, I have just posted a new project idea: »Improve the GDB Port for GNU Hurd«, . | [[/GDB]] is available an

Re: Next weeks: A question about gccgo

Hi Svante! On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:55:32 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > A quick question: > What was the conclusion after you implemented getcontext/setcontext in > assembly? Would it be possible to integrate into Hurd or not? Now summarized on

Re: [PATCH] Large store support for ext2fs

Hello, На 6.04.2013 21:20, Thomas Schwinge написа: > On Sat, 6 Apr 2013 18:23:24 +0200, Richard Braun wrote: >> +static void >> +disk_cache_return_unused (void) >> +{ >> + int index; >> + >> + /* XXX: Touch all pages. It seems that sometimes GNU Mach "forgets" >> + to notify us about evi