Thomas Schwinge, le Wed 07 Nov 2012 16:57:21 +0100, a écrit :
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 11:03:30 +0100, Richard Braun wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:52:01AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > He said he rebooted in between. He must have some other /server passive
> > > entry to pflocal.new.
> >
Hi!
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 11:03:30 +0100, Richard Braun wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:52:01AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > He said he rebooted in between. He must have some other /server passive
> > entry to pflocal.new.
>
> Right. On the other hand, How do you know if your custom pfloca
Svante Signell, le Wed 07 Nov 2012 16:26:50 +0100, a écrit :
> On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 16:11 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Wed 07 Nov 2012 08:46:36 +0100, a écrit :
> > > #> ps -feM|grep pflocal
> > > root 9 3 0:02.69 /hurd/pflocal
> > > root 881 1 0:00.01 /hurd
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 16:11 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 07 Nov 2012 08:46:36 +0100, a écrit :
> > #> ps -feM|grep pflocal
> > root 9 3 0:02.69 /hurd/pflocal
> > root 881 1 0:00.01 /hurd/pflocal.new
>
> btw, the ppid of pflocal.new is 1, which is init, not
Svante Signell, le Wed 07 Nov 2012 08:46:36 +0100, a écrit :
> #> ps -feM|grep pflocal
> root 9 3 0:02.69 /hurd/pflocal
> root 881 1 0:00.01 /hurd/pflocal.new
btw, the ppid of pflocal.new is 1, which is init, not 3, so it has not
been started by the root ext2fs, or at least not the
Svante Signell, le Wed 07 Nov 2012 15:56:33 +0100, a écrit :
> > He said he rebooted in between. He must have some other /server passive
> > entry to pflocal.new.
>
> Any ideas on how to get rid of the passive translator
> at /hurd/pflocal.new. I can kill the active one, but the passive?
As I sai
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 10:52 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Richard Braun, le Wed 07 Nov 2012 10:48:48 +0100, a écrit :
> > > I did the following:
> > > mv /hurd/pflocal.old
> > > cp -p /usr/pflocal.new /hurd/pflocal
> > > rebooted
> > > Looks like both /hurd/pflocal and /hurd/pflocal.new are runni
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:52:01AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> He said he rebooted in between. He must have some other /server passive
> entry to pflocal.new.
Right. On the other hand, How do you know if your custom pflocal server
is actually used ? Unless started as an active translator, you
Richard Braun, le Wed 07 Nov 2012 10:48:48 +0100, a écrit :
> > I did the following:
> > mv /hurd/pflocal.old
> > cp -p /usr/pflocal.new /hurd/pflocal
> > rebooted
> > Looks like both /hurd/pflocal and /hurd/pflocal.new are running:
> > #> ps -feM|grep pflocal
> > root 9 3 0:02.69 /hurd/pf
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 08:46:36AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> Well the code is a pipe, see the attachment in
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2012-11/msg6.html
> and roland refers to pflocal in his reply. Can it happen that the old
> pflocal is still used? I have added print sta
10 matches
Mail list logo