Re: [PATCH,HURD] implement renameat

2012-07-25 Thread Roland McGrath
Make the top line of every new file a descriptive comment. The copyright line goes second. Otherwise that looks fine, so go ahead and commit it with that change. Thanks, Roland

[PATCH,HURD] implement renameat

2012-07-25 Thread Pino Toscano
Hi, the attached patch implements renameat for Hurd; it seems to work fine, and tst-renameat now passes. The copyright starts from the year of the rename implementation, as I basically copied it and slightly adapted to the "at" behaviour. Thanks, -- Pino Toscano Hurd: implement renameat Provi

Fixing select

2012-07-25 Thread Richard Braun
Hello, A while ago [1], issues were found with the use of select along with a timeout. In an attempt to fix those, I have created a branch in the Hurd repository which adds a new call to the io interface, io_select_timeout, and adjusts the servers to support this new call. The core of the implemen

Re: Hurd build system Makeconf

2012-07-25 Thread Barry deFreese
On 7/25/2012 4:48 AM, Richard Braun wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:12:11PM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote: >> Now the question is, what to do with cancel-cond.c? I'm thinking of just >> sticking it in >> libshouldbeinlibc for now? Is there a more appropriate place? > > Why not in libpthread,

Re: Hurd build system Makeconf

2012-07-25 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 10:48:38 +0200, Richard Braun wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:12:11PM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote: > > Now the question is, what to do with cancel-cond.c? I'm thinking of just > > sticking it in > > libshouldbeinlibc for now? Is there a more appropriate place? > >

Re: Hurd build system Makeconf

2012-07-25 Thread Richard Braun
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:12:11PM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote: > Now the question is, what to do with cancel-cond.c? I'm thinking of just > sticking it in > libshouldbeinlibc for now? Is there a more appropriate place? Why not in libpthread, near the pthread_cond_wait and pthread_cond_timedwai