How about ENOERR?? :) Sorry, couldn't resist.
BTW, Thomas has a listing of several of the errors/warnings listed here:
http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/open_issues/glibc.html#index1h1
I'm certainly fine with just adding a value for 0.
Thanks for taking the time to reply.
Barry
On 7/23/2012 3:
Grepping for 'case 0:' shows exactly 8 places where this warning
should arise. One of those is the __hurd_fail inline in hurd.h, so
that one instance probably generates the warning in many
compilations.
Most of these are switches with only a few cases where it would be
easy to just change them to
