Ludovic Courtès, le Mon 05 Mar 2012 23:36:53 +0100, a écrit :
> This patch makes sure /libexec/console-run creates and installs
> /dev/console on the first run without considering it a failure if it
> didn't exist already.
Applied with comment fix, thanks.
Samuel
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Maksym Planeta, le Sun 08 Apr 2012 01:28:48 +0300, a écrit :
>> No, it isn't bogus and should work, but as it is hack that relies on
>> implementation and how it works is not obvious (at least from my point
>> of view), I decided to disable it. Do you think that it shoul
Maksym Planeta, le Sun 08 Apr 2012 01:28:48 +0300, a écrit :
> No, it isn't bogus and should work, but as it is hack that relies on
> implementation and how it works is not obvious (at least from my point
> of view), I decided to disable it. Do you think that it should be
> returned?
It depends ho
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Maksym Planeta, le Sun 08 Apr 2012 00:48:18 +0300, a écrit :
>> > Existing conditions, agreed. But the conditions you introduce are about
>> > one-level only.
>>
>> Really, but I can replace 3 conditions from the beginning of commit with
>> one. Would it fit?
>
> That
Maksym Planeta, le Sun 08 Apr 2012 00:48:18 +0300, a écrit :
> > Existing conditions, agreed. But the conditions you introduce are about
> > one-level only.
>
> Really, but I can replace 3 conditions from the beginning of commit with
> one. Would it fit?
That would be simpler, yes.
> >> Also yo
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Maksym Planeta, le Sun 08 Apr 2012 00:17:43 +0300, a écrit :
>> Samuel Thibault writes:
>> > Maksym Planeta, le Sat 07 Apr 2012 23:20:13 +0300, a écrit :
>> >> > No: as I said, allocate an empty map, so that the existing code can poke
>> >> > at it without testing for i
Maksym Planeta, le Sun 08 Apr 2012 00:17:43 +0300, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault writes:
> > Maksym Planeta, le Sat 07 Apr 2012 23:20:13 +0300, a écrit :
> >> > No: as I said, allocate an empty map, so that the existing code can poke
> >> > at it without testing for its presence or not.
> >> >
> >>
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Maksym Planeta, le Sat 07 Apr 2012 23:20:13 +0300, a écrit :
>> > No: as I said, allocate an empty map, so that the existing code can poke
>> > at it without testing for its presence or not.
>> >
>> >> Purpose of this conditions is checking whether map (or submap) is
>>
Maksym Planeta, le Sat 07 Apr 2012 23:20:13 +0300, a écrit :
> > No: as I said, allocate an empty map, so that the existing code can poke
> > at it without testing for its presence or not.
> >
> >> Purpose of this conditions is checking whether map (or submap) is
> >> already empty.
> >
> > Not emp
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Maksym Planeta, le Sat 07 Apr 2012 21:42:04 +0300, a écrit :
>> Samuel Thibault writes:
>>
>> > Maksym Planeta, le Sat 07 Apr 2012 19:51:56 +0300, a écrit :
>> >> Here is initialization code from pager_alloc():
>> >> if (INDIRECT_PAGEMAP(size)) {
>> >>
Maksym Planeta, le Sat 07 Apr 2012 21:42:04 +0300, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault writes:
>
> > Maksym Planeta, le Sat 07 Apr 2012 19:51:56 +0300, a écrit :
> >> Here is initialization code from pager_alloc():
> >>if (INDIRECT_PAGEMAP(size)) {
> >>alloc_size = INDIREC
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Maksym Planeta, le Sat 07 Apr 2012 19:51:56 +0300, a écrit :
>> Here is initialization code from pager_alloc():
>> if (INDIRECT_PAGEMAP(size)) {
>> alloc_size = INDIRECT_PAGEMAP_SIZE(size);
>> init_value = (dp_map_t)
Maksym Planeta, le Sat 07 Apr 2012 19:51:56 +0300, a écrit :
> Here is initialization code from pager_alloc():
> if (INDIRECT_PAGEMAP(size)) {
> alloc_size = INDIRECT_PAGEMAP_SIZE(size);
> init_value = (dp_map_t)0;
>
> And from pager_extend
Samuel Thibault writes:
>
>> >> Correct errors in default pager and make it work with tmpfs.
>> >
>> > That needs more explanation about how it works.
>> >
>>
>> This is quite a big commit and I made several things there:
>
> So it should be broken down in several commits.
>
OK.
>> >> Take into
Hi,
Thomas Schwinge skribis:
> As »make dist« in some places just considers the current configuration,
> it really is flawed. That's also the reason that you don't notice the
> missing files (but just do a diff of the tarball built by it and the
> source directory) -- they're not used in your c
Hello!
There’s been a lot of work in GNU Mach since 1.3, and there’s still a
lot in the pipeline.
What about restarting the release train by releasing roughly the current
state of ‘master’ as 1.4, along with MIG 1.4?
We could imagine that 1.5 would add x86_64 support, user-level driver
support,
16 matches
Mail list logo
