Re: tmpfs status

Maksym Planeta, le Wed 28 Mar 2012 00:36:07 +0300, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault writes: > > > Please try to set passive and active translators etc. on it. > I've tried it earlier and didn't find any issues, except those, that > I've already corrected. Ok, good. Ideally you should try to put a w

Re: tmpfs status

Samuel Thibault writes: > Please try to set passive and active translators etc. on it. I've tried it earlier and didn't find any issues, except those, that I've already corrected. > IIRC somebody was trying a filesystem testsuite? It was me :) I was trying fsx [1]. It performs random IO operat

Re: tmpfs status

Thomas Schwinge writes: > Did you reboot the machine after every test? > New results are following: dpkg-buildpackage ramfs+ext2fs 50m5s ext2fs

Re: Better debugging support in Mach

Hey! Thomas Schwinge skribis: > On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:51:18 +0200, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic > =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) wrote: [...] >> Yes, but ‘-fomit-frame-pointer’ is enabled “at levels `-O', `-O2', >> `-O3', `-Os'” (info "(gcc) Optimize Options"). >> >> Anyway, building with “-O1 -fno-o