Re: Some experiences with web browsers...

2011-11-10 Thread Svante Signell
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 16:08 +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > Alle giovedì 10 novembre 2011, Svante Signell ha scritto: > > On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 01:00 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Most of these are simply due to dbus, actually. > > > > What's wrong with it, the latest version, 1.4.16-1, seems t

Re: Some experiences with web browsers...

2011-11-10 Thread Pino Toscano
Alle giovedì 10 novembre 2011, Svante Signell ha scritto: > On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 01:00 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Most of these are simply due to dbus, actually. > > What's wrong with it, the latest version, 1.4.16-1, seems to build > OK. But it doesn't work, mainly for two reasons: - mis

Re: Some experiences with web browsers...

2011-11-10 Thread Svante Signell
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 14:12 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, le Thu 10 Nov 2011 07:56:01 +0100, a écrit : > > On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 01:00 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Most of these are simply due to dbus, actually. > > > > What's wrong with it, the latest version, 1.4.16-1, s

Re: [PATCH gnumach] Inline version.m4 into configure.ac

2011-11-10 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, I agree that ‘git-version-gen’ is the way to go (there’s no licensing issue since it’s a build tool.) The change is basically two-fold: 1. http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/tree/configure.ac#n31 2. http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/tree/Makefile.am#n76 Would you lik

Re: Some experiences with web browsers...

2011-11-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Thu 10 Nov 2011 07:56:01 +0100, a écrit : > On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 01:00 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Most of these are simply due to dbus, actually. > > What's wrong with it, the latest version, 1.4.16-1, seems to build OK. Does it have a testsuite to check that it works,

Re: [PATCH] Provide modern Autoconf initialization

2011-11-10 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 23:41:16 +0100, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) wrote: > Samuel Thibault skribis: > > > Ludovic Courtès, le Mon 07 Nov 2011 22:41:02 +0100, a écrit : > >> OK to apply? :-) > > > > Mmm, 0.3 is in Makeconf too, ideally it'd be in one place only. > > I w

Re: [PATCH gnumach] Inline version.m4 into configure.ac

2011-11-10 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 04:49:25 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 00:13:51 +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > In GNU Mach, we have a version.m4 where these fields are defined one and > > for all. (I argue that a package's version definition does not really > > belong into a gen