Hi,
I wrote a first version of my application for this years GSoC and would love to
get feedback from you.
Note: I also intend to apply for fixing Python testsuite failures, but I can’t
finish that tonight.
Python Bindings for the Hurd (PyHurd)
==
## Contact informat
Hello!
As a preparation exercise for GSoC, I have fixed the PATH_MAX issue in
three Debian packages: nekobee, whysynth and libsepol. There is no real
reason I picked these packages, they were just first in the list here:
https://buildd.debian.org/stats/?arch=hurd-i386&state=Failed
Note that they
>> all: $(OBJS)
>> - $(CC) -o $(BINARY) $(OBJS) $(LDFLAGS)
>> + @$(CC) -o $(BINARY) $(OBJS) $(LDFLAGS)
>>
>> .c.o:
>> - $(COMPILE) -c $<
>> + @$(COMPILE) -c $<
>>
>> clean:
>> - rm -f *.o core *.obj *~ $(BINARY)
>> + @rm -f *.o core *.obj *~ $(BINARY) fs_notify.c
>
> This
> That's always a good start! Where is this repository that your patch is
> against?
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/xmlfs/?root=hurdextras
> Your editor / mailer broke the lines, so this patch won't even apply.
> Either you instruct your editor / mailer, or let git send-email take care
> of
> So the idea is that one would launch an XSLT translator, with a XSLT
> style sheet as input, on top of an xmlfs directory, and the result would
> be a file representing the output of the XSLT processor?
Yes, that's what I was thinking. Though, being able to run it on top
of an XML file should be
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Tue 05 Apr 2011 22:24:57 +0200, a écrit :
> So the idea is that one would launch an XSLT translator, with a XSLT
> style sheet as input, on top of an xmlfs directory,
No, I'd rather say on top of an xml file.
Samuel
On 06/04/2011 03:32, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> Hi,
[snip]
>> + Copyright (C) 2002, 2005 HurdFR.
>> + Written by Marc de Saint Sauveur
>> + and Manuel Menal
> Not really related to your patch -- but I wonder, did they really assign
> copyright to HurdFR? I kinda do
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:30 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 12:35 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 11:13 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Svante Signell, le Wed 30 Mar 2011 09:18:05 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > (I don't think the problem is due to qemu-kvm?
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 12:35 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 11:13 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Wed 30 Mar 2011 09:18:05 +0200, a écrit :
> > > (I don't think the problem is due to qemu-kvm?)
...
> Below is the limited information provided by gdb:
Update
