[bug #28934] execve(path, args) should take path as a a relative path if it doesn't contain slashes

2010-03-22 Thread Carl Fredrik Hammar
Follow-up Comment #9, bug #28934 (project hurd): I don't see how the regression is possible given that the changes to the exec server should only affect shell scripts not C programs. Also your patch to glibc doesn't actually make use of _hurd_exec_file_name, which makes the above even more bizarr

[bug #28934] execve(path, args) should take path as a a relative path if it doesn't contain slashes

2010-03-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Follow-up Comment #8, bug #28934 (project hurd): Actually there seems to be a regression: a program like main (int argc, char **argv) { printf ("%s", argv[0]); } put into /bin/foobar, will make $ foobar print ./foobar instead of "foobar", which would be expected and works fine without my pat

Re: too many warning messages from gnumach

2010-03-22 Thread Samuel Thibault
Da Zheng, le Mon 22 Mar 2010 09:13:37 +0800, a écrit : > On 10-3-22 上午1:09, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >> I'm still not sure. The number of pageouts isn't 0 but vmstat doesn't give > >> me > >> anything about swap area. vmstat --swap-active shows me nothing. > >> Is swap disabled? > > > > I'd tend