Re: crosshurd

On 10-1-3 下午4:24, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 10:46:20PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote: > >> I tried crosshurd. It doesn't work. > > That's not a useful problem report... I used crosshurd again. It's working now. Strange. but very cool:) Zheng Da

Re: [bug #28446] No checks are made for unteminated strings in RPC messages

Hi, On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 11:42:52AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 12:11:38PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 08:12:17AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 10:36:35PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar w

crosshurd (was: cannot boot subhurd)

Hi, On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 10:46:20PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote: > I tried crosshurd. It doesn't work. That's not a useful problem report... -antrik-

Re: [bug #28446] No checks are made for unteminated strings in RPC messages

Hi, On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 12:11:38PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 08:12:17AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 10:36:35PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > MIG does have a c_string type after all, which is used to define the > s

Re: cannot boot subhurd

Hi, On 10-1-3 下午11:48, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Yes: > > Of course, this problem will go away / shift from the kernel into > user-space processes as soon as we have disk I/O completely handled in > user space. > > Which, by the

libparted backend for libstore (was: cannot boot subhurd)

Hello! On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 04:56:54PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Thomas Schwinge, le Sun 03 Jan 2010 16:48:00 +0100, a écrit : > > We will need it as soon as we switch from the Mach disk device > > handling to something more modern (DDE). > > It can also be useful for the Xen case, as I

Re: cannot boot subhurd

Thomas Schwinge, le Sun 03 Jan 2010 16:48:00 +0100, a écrit : > We will need it as soon as we switch from the Mach disk device > handling to something more modern (DDE). It can also be useful for the Xen case, as I haven't plugged the xen device drivers to any partition support. Samuel

Re: cannot boot subhurd

Hello! On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 10:59:04PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote: > On 10-1-3 下午9:00, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >> No, I didn't. The new partition isn't in the disk where Hurd runs. Do I > >> still > >> need to restart the kernel? > > > > Yes, fdisk says so: “WARNING: Re-reading the partition tabl

Re: cannot boot subhurd

Da Zheng, le Sun 03 Jan 2010 22:59:04 +0800, a écrit : > On 10-1-3 下午9:00, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >> No, I didn't. The new partition isn't in the disk where Hurd runs. Do I > >> still > >> need to restart the kernel? > > > > Yes, fdisk says so: “WARNING: Re-reading the partition table failed >

Re: cannot boot subhurd

Hi, On 10-1-3 下午9:00, Samuel Thibault wrote: >> No, I didn't. The new partition isn't in the disk where Hurd runs. Do I still >> need to restart the kernel? > > Yes, fdisk says so: “WARNING: Re-reading the partition table failed > with error 1073741902: Function not implemented. The kernel still

Re: cannot boot subhurd

Da Zheng, le Sun 03 Jan 2010 12:37:52 +0800, a écrit : > On 10-1-3 上午3:40, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Da Zheng, le Sat 02 Jan 2010 22:46:20 +0800, a écrit : > >> Yes, I did "mke2fs /dev/hd1". After partitioning, I tried to create hd1s1 > >> device > >> file with MAKEDEV, but got the error "Unknown

Re: Bug-hurd Digest, Vol 86, Issue 3

How to use libdiskfs ?