Re: unionmount branches

Hello! On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:20:45PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 07:11:16AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 06:10:42PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 06:46:49AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > > > wrote: >

Re: man: pipeline, additional questions

> > I believe viengoos doesn't have more drivers that GNU Mach :) > right, this is just what i expected from a project that started more recently than gnu mach and thus is probably being developed to run on machines that are similar to those we have now.. > See http://bugs.debian.org/src:hurd an

Re: man: pipeline, additional questions

Jakub Daniel, le Tue 08 Dec 2009 23:13:15 +0100, a écrit : > If the reality is how You pointed it out then i am much happier right away > :).. > even though i thought viengoos would bring newer drivers and support for > various things that mach has not yed focused on. I believe viengoos doesn't h

Re: man: pipeline, additional questions

> Where did you hear that? i don't know all the sources but i heard it several times but it of course might not be true.. one of the sources is wikipedia.org.. but this one i might have misunderstood. "From early on, the Hurd was developed to use GNU Machas

Re: man: pipeline, additional questions

Jakub Daniel, le Tue 08 Dec 2009 22:27:12 +0100, a écrit : > man: pipeline.c:1671: pipeline_peek_skop: Assertion `len <= p->peek_offset' > failed. This lookes like a bug in Hurd. > i have heard that hurd suffers from difficulties with mach. Where did you hear that? > i was not able to find much

man: pipeline, additional questions

Hello when i tried to examine man page of dpkg i got the following error (not right away but after i scrolled to line 129 or similar): man: pipeline.c:1671: pipeline_peek_skop: Assertion `len <= p->peek_offset' failed. I was also wondering about the following: I read a paper about mach not bei

Re: unionmount branches

Hello, On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 07:11:16AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 06:10:42PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 06:46:49AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > > wrote: > > > > While I do think that such main a "unionmount" branch is probab

[PATCH] Implement the sync libnetfs stubs.

* netfs.c (netfs_attempt_sync): Sync every directory associated with the supplied node. (netfs_attempt_syncfs): Send file_syncfs to every directory maintained by unionfs. --- Hello, On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 09:08:33PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:18:45AM +0200

[PATCH 2/3] Implement mountee startup.

* mount.c (mountee_node): New variable. (mountee_root): Likewise. (mountee_started): Likewise. (start_mountee): New function (based on node_set_translator in nsmux). (setup_unionmount): New function. * mount.h (mountee_root): New variable. (mountee_started): Likewise. (start_mountee): New function.