Am Samstag, 28. November 2009 00:48:26 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> Sure, I don't question the need for smart developers... What I'm saying
> is that (unlike switching microkernels), the existing implementation
> requires a lot of less challenging work also -- it's just not true that
> we don
Am Mittwoch, 25. November 2009 14:31:30 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> The other plan would have the advantage that it would be built directly
> on top of the stuff I'm doing for my thesis... Essentially, I'm telling
> myself that the KGI stuff is part of the big puzzle -- so I don't have
> to
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:04:24PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Sun 22 Nov 2009 22:04:22 +0100, a écrit :
> > (BTW, I don't actually agree on the "really smart developers only"
> > part either. Unless you are among those who believe that any work on
> > the exis
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 07:59:33PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 09:05:16PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:28:37AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > > + /* Fetch the effective UIDs of the unionfs process. */
> > > + nuids =
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 2. Dezember 2009 09:24:54 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
> Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> >> Also thanks to Samuel Thibault, the latest grub2 package
> >> (1.97+20091125-1)
>
> Note that this version has a segfault that is triggered when running
> grub-install or grub-mkconfig.
Heya
Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> Also thanks to Samuel Thibault, the latest grub2 package (1.97+20091125-1)
Note that this version has a segfault that is triggered when running
grub-install or grub-mkconfig. The 1.97+20091130-1 package fixes this issue
though, so I suggest to use that version
