Am Dienstag, 17. November 2009 22:38:39 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> The problem with learning bit by bit is that you only look up things if
> you want to do something new. You never get a complete picture; you
> never learn how you could do things more efficiently, and/or with better
> resul
Hi,
I only glanced over the patch this time, no full review... Considering
how often I looked at it already, I doubt that I would find anything new
-- diminishing returns etc. :-)
I'd say this patch series is finally ready to go...
-antrik-
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:51:21AM +0200, unlimitedscol...@gmail.com
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 12:29:54PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 06:37:54AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> > > wrote:
> > > > Well, I can't really give a final ACK without s
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:30:56PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 09:58:31AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 06:56:41PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > > That's why I think I agree with you and I made unionfs sync every
> > > unioned
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:15:59PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> If run by any other user then it can only recreate the intersection of
> credentials between unionfs and the client. This isn't ideal, but it
> does ensure that unionfs doesn't accidentally grant the client any new
> perm
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 02:18:10PM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Montag, 16. November 2009 11:34:22 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
> I think the reason is simply that it's damn far from how I learned
> webdesign.
>
> Instead of the smooth learning curve you get by defining more and mor
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:34:14AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 07:19:29PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > * .gitignore: New file.
> Generally, I don't like these ignore files too much. But if you
> promise to maintain this file (whatever this means -- no maintena
Hello,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:21:13AM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:15:16AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:29:40PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> > >
> > > 1. Alice opens unionfs directory
> > > 2. unionfs opens unioned director
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:21:20 +0100
Jakub Daniel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I didnt mention it before but every time i try tu run halt everything
> freezes and nothing happens... when i start the system again it says that
> the fs wasnt unmounted properly..
> what do i do wrong.
>
> Jakub
I prefer reb
Jakub Daniel, le Wed 18 Nov 2009 18:25:32 +0100, a écrit :
> Definitely hurd console ... I configured it to run after boot up.
Ok, then in that case it's normal that you don't see the gnumach
messages: they are "behind" the hurd console. We'd probably need to
setup syslog or such to dump gnumach
Definitely hurd console ... I configured it to run after boot up.
2009/11/18 Samuel Thibault
> Jakub Daniel, le Wed 18 Nov 2009 18:21:20 +0100, a écrit :
> > I didnt mention it before but every time i try tu run halt everything
> freezes
> > and nothing happens...
>
> Are you running the Hurd co
Jakub Daniel, le Wed 18 Nov 2009 18:21:20 +0100, a écrit :
> I didnt mention it before but every time i try tu run halt everything freezes
> and nothing happens...
Are you running the Hurd console or just the Mach console? (I.e. are
you able to switch between virtual consoles thanks to alt-fx)
S
Hello,
I didnt mention it before but every time i try tu run halt everything
freezes and nothing happens... when i start the system again it says that
the fs wasnt unmounted properly..
what do i do wrong.
Jakub
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:15:16AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:29:40PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> >
> > I don't so much want to create a new file access mechanism, as I
> > want to rely on the unioned directories own access mechanism, and let
> > them deci
Hello,
I'm really sorry, but it might happen that I won't be able to be
present at today's meeting either. I estimate the probability of my
presence at about 0.7.
In case I won't be able to make it for the meeting, I'm telling that
I've implemented (but not yet tested) the special O_NOTRANS
func
15 matches
Mail list logo