Hello, i am getting this:
.
.
.
Setting up x11-common (1:7.4+4)
insserv: warning: script 'K01pcmcia' missing LSB tags and overrides
insserv: warning: script 'pcmcia' missing LSB tags and overrides
insserv: warning: script 'ifupdown-clean' missing LSB tags and overrides
insserv: warning: script 'ifu
Am Sonntag, 1. November 2009 09:53:44 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> > > The point is that there is hardly anything you need to learn for
> > > specific tasks like integrating many branches -- once you understand
> > > the basics, most specific tasks become trivial!
> >
> > That's not really a
Am Sonntag, 1. November 2009 11:54:28 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> Another variant is zmv, which is part of zsh. I comes with its whole own
> language for specifying non-trivial filename patterns... Which is just
> idiocy. People would be much better off spending the time on learning
> generi
* mount.c (mountee_node): New variable.
(mountee_root): Likewise.
(mountee_started): Likewise.
(start_mountee): New function (based on node_set_translator
in nsmux).
(setup_unionmount): New function.
* mount.h (mountee_root): New variable.
(mountee_started): Likewise.
(start_mountee): New function.
Hello.
I installed hurd in qemu from L1 DVD iso and only now I noticed an error at
the very end of native-install:
Setting up apt-utils (0.7.24) ...
I just make sure that /libexec/runsystem is properly updated.
./MAKEDEV: 53: function: not found
eval: 1: hd0s1: not found
./MAKEDEV: 56: Syntax err
* netfs.c (netfs_attempt_sync): Sync every directory associated
with the supplied node.
(netfs_attempt_syncfs): Send file_syncfs to every directory
maintained by unionfs.
---
Hello,
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 06:56:41PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> That's why I think I agree with you and I made u
* mount.c (start_mountee): Add the mountee's filesystem to the
list of merged filesystems.
* node.c (node_init_root): Take into consideration the fact that
an empty string refers to the mountee root.
* ulfs.c (ulfs_check): Likewise.
(ulfs_register): Don't check whether "" is a valid directory.
---
* netfs.c (netfs_attempt_sync): Sync every writable directory
associated with the supplied node.
(netfs_attempt_syncfs): Send file_syncfs to every writable
directory maintained by unionfs.
---
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 01:03:29AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 a
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 07:30:41AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 01:03:30PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > If one would like to keep *both* the information about the filesystems
> > *and* the ports to their root nodes in *a single* place, one would
> >
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 12:31:33PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 09:51:29PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 07:14:17PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>
> > > [...] named filter there. (Or perhaps filterfs? -- your dice.)
> >
> > Th
Hello,
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 01:52:47PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 06:51:43PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > I do backups of sensitive information, but the reason I want a
> > snapshotting filesystem for is automated decision when to do the
> > backup.
>
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 07:19:47AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 06:13:47PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > I think I have an extra argument for the second way: if I create a
> > separate commit before the merge, things will stop working,
>
> Yeah, you a
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 07:11:16AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 06:10:42PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 06:46:49AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> > wrote:
>
> > > While I do think that such main a "unionmount" branch is probab
Am Sonntag, 1. November 2009 13:52:47 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> The original idea for versioning filesystems was to automatically keep
> track of individual changes, and it failed magnificently.
As far as I know they didn't have atomic commits back then - am I right in
that?
> This is
Am Sonntag, 1. November 2009 13:17:27 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 08:34:50AM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> I think that already hints at the problem: while such tools are trivial
> enough for the really simple use cases (e.g. "zmv '*.JPG' '*.jpeg'"),
> there i
15 matches
Mail list logo
