Re: hurd-web/hurd/translator/unionmount.mdwn

2009-09-22 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 11:04:58PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 02:15:44AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 06:07:01PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > > There is hurd-web/hurd/translator/unionmount.mdwn, > > > but it's the description

Re: nsmux: Integration with the Hurd Git Repository

2009-09-22 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 11:00:40PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 01:53:08AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 02:30:46PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > > Note that as opposed to some other translators (like Zheng's > > > eth-multiplex

Re: github terms of use?

2009-09-22 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 09:45:26PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Montag, 7. September 2009 01:53:08 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net: > > As I said before, github has nasty terms of use; I'd rather we get > > rid of it. Gitorious supposedly has nicer ones -- though I haven't > > che

--nomount without -u (was: Personalized Filesystem)

2009-09-22 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 06:07:20AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: >settrans myroot unionfs / --mount overlay && chroot myroot > > (BTW, this is an obvious use case for union-mounting with something > different than the underlying node -- why didn't I see this before? Actually the

Re: subhurds etc.

2009-09-22 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:46:23AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 01:59:49AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > wrote: > > It's much more interesting to have a partially customized > > environment *without* booting a complete extra system instance; but > > rather accessin

Re: hurd-web/hurd/translator/unionmount.mdwn

2009-09-22 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:49:11AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > It's a trap into which groups often seem to fall (in my experience). > I often discussed with a former roommate for hours how we could > perfectly do something and in the end we didn't have any more time so > we couldn't

wiki (was: Mercurial vs. git)

2009-09-22 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 04:17:31PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > I don't quite remember everything back then. Maybe it was ikiwiki, but > Thomas changed it to working with a git backend It was twiki before. The funny thing is that a short time after the switch, I talked to someone v

Re: [PATCH] Apply pattern-matching immediately beneath the stow directory.

2009-09-22 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:05:04PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:55:48AM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > > However, both this and my proposal (which you really intended), is > > just as efficient as the original implementation. Matching PATTERN > > under all di

VCS (was: hurd-web/hurd/translator/unionmount.mdwn)

2009-09-22 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:08:23AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > Seeing how advertently you propagate Mercurial in every applicable > task, I think I'll have to have a look at it :-) It should be worth > the time ;-) Only if you actually get involved in a project using it. Learning another

Re: hurd-web/hurd/translator/unionmount.mdwn

2009-09-22 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 12:28:09PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Do you mean, they either are ugly for people who want to synchronize > their own repository, or they are ugly to those who want to read the > history later on? > > For me the first is a concern, but the latter doesn't

Re: Mercurial vs. git

2009-09-22 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 04:18:29PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 08:46:06AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > "hg rollback" can also be used to undo pulling from someone, since > > it just reverts the last change to the history. > > Sounds great; I'm can't remem

Re: Debian GNU/Hurd: error building hurd binaries without compiler optimization option

2009-09-22 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:26:59PM +0200, computer.enthusiastic wrote: > Another interesting clue is that the gcc error *ONLY* occurs when the > -O2 compiler option is omitted from the ./configure file and, this > way, from the main Makefile. In other words, this error seems not to > interfer

Re: Discussing to death

2009-09-22 Thread Sergiu Ivanov
Hello, On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 08:37:41AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 16. September 2009 17:29:01 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov: > > > > It's hard to do that, though, if the discussion is a prerequisite to > > > beginning at all. I hope the suggestion for the wiki helps reducing > >

Re: Mercurial vs. git

2009-09-22 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Am Mittwoch, 16. September 2009 17:59:09 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov: > Indeed, having the wiki in git is considerably more comfortable (and > faster, BTW) then doing web commits. Also, it helps keep things in > order :-) Definitely. And it's also nice being able to work out something at home and alw