> Here is one additional topic I want to confirm with you all before
> committing it: the duplication of ChangeLog snippets and commit log
> messages is a pain. However, it is not mandatory to maintain ChangeLog
> files in the VCS sources -- it's fine with the GNU Coding Standards to
> only create
Hello!
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:49:01AM +0200, I wrote:
> So, I'd rather go for the conversion method, to not hide the previous
> history. And, as I'm already in this dirty business -- a bunch of the
> main Hurd's repositories and their branches have already been published,
> by the way -- I'm
Hello!
A bit of a status update.
The CVS to Git conversion is mostly finished.
There are still some quirks with converting the
gnumach-1-branch-Xen-branch, but I'm working on resolving these with the
help of the conversion program's author, Simon 'corecode' Schubert, whose
fromcvs / rcsparse com
Hello!
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:37:27AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> mremap cannot be defined correctly in terms of mmap and munmap.
Not the complete interface, for sure. And even for the specific bit I
mentioned I'm not sure it would be possible at all (thinking about
preserving MAP_* and P
Hello,
writes:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 08:35:07PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>> Carl Fredrik Hammar writes:
>
>> > Well it isn't simpler in the sense that we'd need to maintain two
>> > very similar yet different code bases. Improvements to one would
>> > likely get ported to the other.
> [.
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:04 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:01:56PM +0100, Da Zheng wrote:
>
> > I logged all RPCs and tried to analyze them. (antrik, I was wrong.
> > There aren't 100, 000 RPCs. The number of RPCs to the Mach during the
> > subhurd booting is about 20,00
