Re: Unionmount. Basic details

2009-04-06 Thread Carl Fredrik Hammar
Hi, On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 04:26:25PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to start a discussion about some basic details > implementation of the unionmount project. > > Firstly, the implementation was suggested in two ways: as a stand-alone > translator and as a series of exten

Unionmount. Basic details

2009-04-06 Thread Sergiu Ivanov
Hello, I would like to start a discussion about some basic details implementation of the unionmount project. Firstly, the implementation was suggested in two ways: as a stand-alone translator and as a series of extensions to lib{net,disk}fs libraries. These two approaches have there advantages an