Hi,
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:46:38PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> On 23/01/2009, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> > Design and feasible use cases are *not* orthogonal in practice.
>
> They are certainly not. I never said they are.
You did imply it, by repeatedly claiming that all we wan
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:01 PM, wrote:
> As I already pointed out, sooner or later we will problably need some
> framework to conflate simimlar translator instances in a single process
> -- while dynamic translators are likely to make the problem evident in
> many cases, the problem its
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:33 PM, wrote:
>
> No, it's not!
>
> I explicitely said that the node is *not* discarded when it is still
> used, i.e. when the device it represents is still open. It is only
> discarded when there are *no* users anymore, i.e. neither references to
> the node itself, nor t
