Am Samstag 06 Dezember 2008 22:17:12 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> So you have offlist discussions, have you? I feel left out ;-)
The discussion stumbled offline since Michal accidently only answered to me
and I wasn't sure if he just wanted to avoid spamming the list with DRM
discussions..
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 06:49:12PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 3:40 AM, wrote:
> By proxying control ports do you mean creating shadow nodes containing
> ports to the real control ports?
Well, the terminology is totally wrong: We are not creating any *nodes*
here. N
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 09:07:48PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:20 AM, wrote:
> I mean, should we adopt the idea of taking a BSD kernel, throwing out
> UNIX stuff, and implementing generic primitives as a possible roadmap.
> Working in this direction we could possib
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 07:28:23PM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 03 Dezember 2008 13:57:12 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> > When a process needs the service of another process which deals with
> > resources it has no access to itself -- say a powerbox -- it doesn't
> >
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 10:22:00PM +0100, Davi Leal wrote:
> Proposal: Add to the list the below one, as a long term goal.
>
> * The possibility to get a kernel "GPLv3 or later" compatible.
This is closely related to having a complete GNU system I would say --
both are likely to attract t
