On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 19:31 +0200, Da Zheng wrote:
> I don't want to destroy the port. I just want to check if all ports have
> already been destroyed before the goaway routine is called.
To check, you use the counting routines provided.
> The device file is created by a translator to help other
hi,
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:46:52AM +0200, Da Zheng wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 03:27:06PM +0200, zhengda wrote:
>>> - socket_t server;
>>> + socket_t server = MACH_PORT_NULL;
>>
>> As I already said, this is unnecessary -- it will be assigned
>> unconditiona
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:55:52AM +0200, Da Zheng wrote:
> by the way, which letter should be used for the short option? or
> should I just use the long option '--device'?
I think a short option is rather important, as this is likely to be used
often: For running subhurds unprivileged, you
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:30:56PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 2:13 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 09:11:08PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > > The situation about starting the translator could possibly be
> > > handled similarly to the way
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 13:20 +0200, Da Zheng wrote:
Yes, these ports have the receive rights.
They are used for the user program, and I want to make sure they have
all been destroyed before the translator exits, so the translator knows
all user programs connected t
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 13:20 +0200, Da Zheng wrote:
> Yes, these ports have the receive rights.
> They are used for the user program, and I want to make sure they have
> all been destroyed before the translator exits, so the translator knows
> all user programs connected to it have all exited and
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 19:36 +0200, Da Zheng wrote:
As I said above, I have to make sure all ports created for the user
program have been destroyed before the translator exits.
Are these ports that the translator has the receive rights to? If so,
then when th
Am Montag 25 August 2008 09:20:51 schrieb Neal H. Walfield:
> What are you looking for that I didn't say in my note?
Something which people can find easily on a Google search :)
The note published as public comment on the article site would fill that role
nicely, too.
(just thinking about get
At Mon, 25 Aug 2008 07:53:05 +0200,
Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Could you write a counter-story/public reply for the Hurd-Wiki?
>
> It needn't be long, but it should be available online.
What are you looking for that I didn't say in my note?
Neal
