Re: The patch of glibc which allows the user to override the pfinet server

Hi, On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 06:27:00PM +0200, zhengda wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> But isn't it always right to initialize a local variable to reduce >>> the possibility of getting bugs? >> >> It won't avoid bugs; only either cover them up, or (less likely) >> expose them more clearly -

Re: A bug of subhurd?

Hi, On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:10:50PM +0200, zhengda wrote: > I run subhurd. When I try to exit it by running 'halt', I get the error > message as follow: > init: notifying ext2fs.static hd1s1 of shutdown...init: Killing pid 64 > memory_object_data_request(0x0, 0x0, 0x1000, 0x1000, 0x1) faile

A bug of subhurd?

Hello, First, I'm not sure if it is a bug of subhurd. I run subhurd. When I try to exit it by running 'halt', I get the error message as follow: init: notifying ext2fs.static hd1s1 of shutdown...init: Killing pid 64 memory_object_data_request(0x0, 0x0, 0x1000, 0x1000, 0x1) failed, 268435459 mem

A bug of subhurd?

Hello, First, I'm not sure if it is a bug of subhurd. I run subhurd. When I try to exit it by running 'halt', I get the error message as follow: init: notifying ext2fs.static hd1s1 of shutdown...init: Killing pid 64 memory_object_data_request(0x0, 0x0, 0x1000, 0x1000, 0x1) failed, 268435459 mem