[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last time on IRC, if I understand it correctly, you said the
optimization is to make all packets go through the kernel, and the
kernel dispatches the packet with the BPF.
Not quite. The idea was that if you have a multiplexer sitting directly
on the kernel interfac
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you mean the indentation here? It is caused by '-' and '+' in the
beginning of lines.
Ah, I see it now. That shouldn't happen, though. How did you generate
the patch?
for this case, I use
diff -u glibc-2.7-old/hurd/hurdsock.c glibc-2.7/hurd/hurdsock.c
Zhen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only difference between translators and other programs is that a
translator uses the bootstrap port, while other programs ignore it. As
the translator subprocess is forked from the "outer" helper program
invoked through settrans, the bootstrap port is copied to it. Th
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote:
zhengda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Anyway, I provide two more environment variables SOCK_INET_SERV_PATH
and SOCK_LOCAL_SERV_PATH for the pfinet server and pflocal server,
respectively.
I try to make my code meet the GNU coding standard.
http://www.gnu.org
Am Sonntag 29 Juni 2008 06:21:16 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> I'll try to keep it in mind... But no promises :-)
Thanks anyway :-)
> Sanitizing history is about purging stuff that doesn't matter for the
> end result; not about dropping important information. If people don't
> understand the impo
