Re: GSoC: the plan for the project network virtualization

2008-06-10 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 10:12:21PM +0200, zhengda wrote: > 1) hypervisor creates a virtual network interface >How is the programming interface like for the virtual network >interface? I mean, is the pfinet still able to open it with >device_open()? Well, as I mentioned in the or

Re: Revision control

2008-06-10 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 01:18:25AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > [...] and because of some glitches like having to garbage collect > regularly instead of having a lean implementation in the first place. Again, this is not a glitch, but a conscious decision -- and a brilliant one at

Re: Fwd: Re: Revision control

2008-06-10 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 01:39:51AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Samstag 07 Juni 2008 18:19:29 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > Err... Does that mean that Mercurial doesn't even offer rebase (and > > it can't be implemented trivially)?! > > That means, that the Mercurial people say,

Re: Updating the progress

2008-06-10 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi Madhusudan, On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 08:45:06PM +0530, Madhusudan C.S wrote: > Yes, some parts of the code is a template of other netfs translators. > But if seen keenly, nearly almost all the translators I am referring > follows the same template or rather have copied the template from one > a

Re: Namespace-based translator selection; project details

2008-06-10 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 11:21:10PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:13 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nevertheless, there is a lot of merit in your observation: I realise > > now that there is really no reason to externally classify the > > translators, and attach th

Re: Revision control

2008-06-10 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 09:29:00AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Samstag 07 Juni 2008 17:47:28 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > If git isn't readily usable for me, then it is quite probable, that it > is unusable for many programmers, including some who might be > interested in contrib

Hypervisor

2008-06-10 Thread zhengda
Hi everyone, I will create the network virtualization in Hurd, so I need to implement a mechanism which help pfinet servers communicate with each other. That is, for example, if pfinet 1 has IP A and pfinet 2 has IP B, the packet sent by pfinet 1 with destination address IP B should be receive

Re: Possible bug in name of command 'settrans'

2008-06-10 Thread massimo s.
A.Salatov ha scritto: No, you correct me if I'm wrong, but when I think about 'settrans' my mind always going to compare it to 'umount' and I started to think about a reasons why 'umount' is 'umount' and not 'unmount'. I've always found *that* a bug. umount means nothing. uNmount has a meaning

Hypervisor

2008-06-10 Thread zhengda
Hi everyone, I will create the network virtualization in Hurd, so I need to implement a mechanism which help pfinet servers communicate with each other. That is, for example, if pfinet 1 has IP A and pfinet 2 has IP B, the packet sent by pfinet 1 with destination address IP B should be receive