Thomas Thurman wrote:
2008/6/9 A.Salatov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
In name of command 'settrans' is too many times used 't'. Actualy it is
used in it's name, twice. But normaly name of this command must unclude 't'
only once. So in normal form, name of this command, must be such: 'setrans'.
In g
Hi Olaf,
Well, not being familiar with libnetfs, I unfortunately can't really
> tell whether the code makes sense.
>
> I didn't discover any obvious errors when looking at it -- but then,
> it's not surprising, considering that most of the code seems to be
> template code more or less directly cop
2008/6/9 A.Salatov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
> In name of command 'settrans' is too many times used 't'. Actualy it is
> used in it's name, twice. But normaly name of this command must unclude 't'
> only once. So in normal form, name of this command, must be such: 'setrans'.
> In general it is a
Hi,
In name of command 'settrans' is too many times used 't'. Actualy it is
used in it's name, twice. But normaly name of this command must unclude
't' only once. So in normal form, name of this command, must be such:
'setrans'. In general it is a minor bug, but it is bug. ;-)
