[task #5488] Update the device driver glue code in GNU Mach

2008-04-13 Thread anonymous
Follow-up Comment #4, task #5488 (project hurd): http://buytramadol.ning.com/ http://tramadolcheap.ning.com/ http://tramadolx.ning.com/ http://buyviagra.ning.com/ http://bestbuyx.ning.com/ http://buyxanax.ning.com/ http://vicodin.ning.com/ http://cheapairlinetickets.ning.com/ http://cheapflight.n

Re: GSoC project about virtualization using Hurd mechanisms

2008-04-13 Thread zhengda
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, not really. Unlike the full network hypervisor, which I mentioned as an alternative design, the BPF translator is only responsible for setting the filter rules; the actual packets are still sent/received through the kernel device directly... But being in charge

Re: GSoC project about virtualization using Hurd mechanisms

2008-04-13 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:50:22AM +0200, zhengda wrote: > I have a question: why is it not safe for two pfinets to share one > device? the communication between the device driver and pfinet is IPC. > As long as IPC communication is safe, the device driver should be able > to get all packets