Neal H. Walfield, le Sun 23 Dec 2007 11:05:58 +0100, a écrit :
> The implementation never returns a TID with a value of 0.
Oh, it's odd that I never noticed that. That should be all fine.
Samuel
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.
At Sat, 22 Dec 2007 23:15:58 +0100,
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> The NSPR needs an invalid value for pthread_t, which the Hurd doesn't
> officially have. I had proposed them to use -1 (since that would mean
> that there are something like 2^32 threads running, which just can't
> be...), but they don't
