Re: Drop Olivetti XP7/XP9?

2006-12-30 Thread Thomas Schwinge
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 12:23:21PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Found yet another hideous hack in i386/intel/pmap.c for the old olivetti > XP7/XP9. Any objection to my dropping it? It's already deprecated with ``#error might not work anymore'' (if we're talking about the same thing), so, yes,

Re: [PATCH] Support for alignment in the zone allocator

2006-12-30 Thread Barry deFreese
Richard Braun wrote: Here is a patch that does it all. Any comments ? 2006-12-30 Richard Braun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Added alignment support in the zone allocator. * kern/zalloc.c (ALIGN_SIZE_UP): New macro. (zinit): New `align' parameter. (zget_space): Likewis

Re: Drop Olivetti XP7/XP9?

2006-12-30 Thread Barry deFreese
Samuel Thibault wrote: Hi, Found yet another hideous hack in i386/intel/pmap.c for the old olivetti XP7/XP9. Any objection to my dropping it? Samue Not from me.. :-) Thanks Samuel! Barry ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gn

[PATCH] Support for alignment in the zone allocator

2006-12-30 Thread Richard Braun
Here is a patch that does it all. Any comments ? 2006-12-30 Richard Braun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Added alignment support in the zone allocator. * kern/zalloc.c (ALIGN_SIZE_UP): New macro. (zinit): New `align' parameter. (zget_space): Likewise. (zone_bootst

Drop Olivetti XP7/XP9?

2006-12-30 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hi, Found yet another hideous hack in i386/intel/pmap.c for the old olivetti XP7/XP9. Any objection to my dropping it? Samuel ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd