Hello!
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 04:15:18PM +0100, christian nastasi wrote:
> how can I proceed to test the mach_debug interface? What kind of test do you
> suggest me to verify it work properly in kernel? It seems that give some
> result, but since I didn' t find any documentation on this interface
Hello!
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 03:53:56PM +0100, I wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 11:27:58PM +0100, I wrote:
> > [Building glibc with GCC 4.1.]
> >
> > And in fact also glibc-proper code is affected:
> >
> > #v+
> > [EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]:/var/tmp/glibc-GCC4.1-without_Roland_patches/glibc-2.3.
Dear all,
how can I proceed to test the mach_debug interface? What kind of test do you
suggest me to verify it work properly in kernel? It seems that give some
result, but since I didn' t find any documentation on this interface I want
to know if somebody have an idea.
Thanks for any suggestions,
Hello!
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 11:27:58PM +0100, I wrote:
> [Building glibc with GCC 4.1.]
>
> And in fact also glibc-proper code is affected:
>
> #v+
> [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]:/var/tmp/glibc-GCC4.1-without_Roland_patches/glibc-2.3.6.ds1/build-tree/hurd-i386-libc
> $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. gdb --args l
Hello Halil!
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 03:20:06PM +0200, Halil Demirezen wrote:
> I want to apply for the "Maintaining Tool Chain" project.
Please describe the experience you already have with the GNU tool chain
and which parts you would like to work on.
Regards,
Thomas
signature.asc
Descript
Hello Christian!
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 06:42:21PM +0100, christian nastasi wrote:
> [...]
Please, in the future, post such questions to the
mailing list. I also cced this email there. You don't need to be
subscribed to post there.
> Is the mach_debug interface already built in in the gnuma
