当グループは男性に一切のご負担なく高収入女性をご紹介致します。
当グループの会員は全て女性のみで構成されておりますが、最近同じようなグループが多発したことにより男性のご登録が非常に少なくなっております。
しかしその一方で女性のご登録数がこの時期でかなり急増致しまして、男性をご紹介できる女性が制限されてしまい、女性から不満の声が高まっております。
そういう理由があり今回女性に対しての男性のご紹介人数調整のため貴方様にメールをさせて頂きました。
男性には必ず一日最低10万円～お礼金が渡されるようになっております。
興味がございましたら下記アドレスに「紹介希望」とご記入の上ご返信下さい。
≪無料
XFL Cheerleaders in 1814 Fun let me see...I must go in 1806
<>___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
Title:
Электронные рассылки рекламы
Доступно, качественно
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman
Title: туристическое агентство созвездие новый век предлагает созвездие лучших
туров
Дорогие друзья!
Туристическое
агентство «Созвездие Путешествий»
предлагает Вам
отдых на лучших курортах мира!
Самые популярные направления:
ОАЭ – от 350 $
ЕГИПЕТ – о
Yeah, so inst_fetch or its callers are buggy. The segment registers are
never validated. The fault recovery stuff is not there for GP faults,
though I don't think it would be real hard to add. Since the callers are
in fault-handling cases already, it's probably easiest just to validate the
segme
Try this on for size. Hopefully this will result in some user
program crashing rather than a kernel panic when whatever problem
you hit happens.
Why thanks, right when I was hacking gnumach todo exactly this, it decided to panic!!!
:-)
___
B
Try this on for size. Hopefully this will result in some user program
crashing rather than a kernel panic when whatever problem you hit happens.
--- gnumach/i386/i386/trap.c.~1.5.~ 2002-05-27 16:02:30.0 -0700
+++ gnumach/i386/i386/trap.c2004-10-31 13:23:44.246363356 -0800
@@ -503,
> Kernel General protection trap, eip 0x1403b8
> kernel trap, type 13, code = 14
Any time you get a kernel trap, you need to look at the disassembly of the
kernel code around the trap and show it to us. (You also haven't said which
kernel this is.) That plus the register values wi
> Kernel General protection trap, eip 0x1403b8
> kernel trap, type 13, code = 14
Any time you get a kernel trap, you need to look at the disassembly of the
kernel code around the trap and show it to us. (You also haven't said which
kernel this is.) That plus the register values will probably ind
I forgot to mention that the kernel should be avaiable at
www.update.uu.se/~ams/home/gnumach-1. Though, last time I checked
that box was done, but it should be up soon.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/b
While compiling libc I got the following panic (note that I wasn't
doing any funky things at all, just had libc compiling):
Kernel General protection trap, eip 0x1403b8
kernel trap, type 13, code = 14
Dump of i386_saved_state 15d1cf28:
EAX 0017 EBX 000d ECX 15d1cfff EDX 001c
ESI 010d96
$BHNGd5~6h2r#1#0#0!]#1(J
$BEEOC(J0774-55-1479
$Bhttp://nihonbare.dyndns.dk/scripts/deleteform.html $B!!(J
$B!!(J http://aassx.minidns.net/scripts/deleteform.html
(B
(B10$B7nCf$K=8$a$?(J180$BK|%a!<%k$r%5!<%S%9Cf!*(J
$B%5%$%I%S%8%M%9$N7hDjHG$G$9!*!!(J
$B>pJs%S%8%
This notification was sent using automated system. Please
process to stop the auto generated email.
The case number: #947367 of Sun, 31 Oct 2004 08:30:55 -0600
We recently reviewed your app. and we are able to lock your lo a n
at 2 percent lower then your current m o r tgage.
Please activate yo
Not sure if this is what Alfred had in mind, but that's how I got it.
Thing is, I only know of the behaviour from the program that I would
like to see. I haven't thought about the exact implementation
details.
Maybe I should just whip up something and see... But first I have to
fix this darn
Today at 9:09, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> I like this idea too, for real log files this has more sense. But I
> am not sure at all how one would go about to implement.
>
> When one writes N bytes to the file when at the end of the file, one
> would somehow have to remove the N top bytes, and push
Hi Ognyan,
Today at 10:06, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> POSIX read/write can't work as expected when filesystem changes file
> pointer at fs's own will.
I don't think there's a need to change file pointer at all. It's only
up to the translator to treat any file pointer into (100MB+something)
as pointe
masterpath FileSync is a real-time and scheduled file replication and synchronisation software for servers on TCP/IP networks. It is a synchornisation/replication software designed for replicating or synchronising a master server with multiple slave(Client) servers. The master server hosts
Title: топлзя ьушкяявэ цшэл озгмуця
ТРИБУНА ЗАЩИТЫ
ЖИВОТНЫХ
www.ANIMALSPROTECTIONTRIBUNE.ru
На этом сайте:
- оболванивание: стерилизация бездомных животных
в Москве
- за последние два года бездомные собаки уже
сьели не один десяток людей
- авторитет вспоминает, - я пришла проситься на
ра
男性なら「もっと簡単にHがしたい！」「付き合うためにあまり費用を掛けたくない！」と思う方は多いのではないでしょうか？
今回当グループにて細かいこと抜きでHをたくさんしたいというちょっとワケアリでHな女性だけを集めて貴方にご紹介します！
しかし、いざできるとなれば少しは選り好みをしたいのが男ゴコロ…
貴方のお住まいの地域をご記入して頂くだけで私共が素早く貴方の近くにいるHな女性達の情報を無料公開します♪
例えば…
・彼氏を作れなくてずっと一人で慰めている欲求不満のOL
・生理前でムラムラしてる…でも夫とのセックスはマンネリでもっと刺激が欲しい人妻
・仕事命だけどやっぱり孤独はイヤ…一夜限り
Ognyan Kulev wrote:
POSIX read/write can't work as expected when filesystem changes file
pointer at fs's own will.
Perhaps it's not explicitly stated in POSIX, but it's expected that
noone except file descriptor's owner can change file pointer.
After thinking more about it, it's perfectly legal
If program uses POSIX API, then there should be POSIX behaviour.
Meh, I was unclear. What I meant was that the translator can do
whatever it wants to the file offset. Aslong as read/write/whatever
work as expected.
One way to circumvent this is by declaring that this is socket, not
fi
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
I'm not sure if POSIX allows filesystem (by its own will) to change
file offset of user file descriptor.
We don't have to care about POSIX here.
If program uses POSIX API, then there should be POSIX behaviour. In
POSIX, each file descriptor has file pointer/offset/wh
BTW, isn't it good to have logrotate[1] translator?
Sure, but not as part of the rollover translator. logrotate might be
made part of a versioning translator, since they behave in a similar
manner. The only difference is that you don't save the old content
when you start a new version.
Ognyan Kulev wrote:
Another possible implementation is to use sparse blocks: keeping
everything before the last X bytes to be sparse blocks. So file will be
huge, but only the part we are interested in is saved physically. But I
think we don't have RPC that make sparse blocks inside file, not
I'm not sure if POSIX allows filesystem (by its own will) to change
file offset of user file descriptor.
We don't have to care about POSIX here.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
Should proboly be merged with th pervious comment fix patch.
hurd/ChangeLog
2004-10-31 Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* io.defs (io_read, io_write): Comment fix.
--- hurd/io.defs11 Jun 2002 23:37:16 +0200 1.36
+++ hurd/io.defs31 Oct 2004 10:29:40 +0100
Fixes a outdated comment, the id_tag argument hasn't existed since
about 1996.
hurd/ChangeLog
2004-10-31 Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* io.defs (io_select): Comment fix.
--- hurd/io.defs11 Jun 2002 23:37:16 +0200 1.36
+++ hurd/io.defs31 Oct 2004 10:21:13 +0
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
I got this funky idea today, but I'm not sure what would be the best
way to implement it. What it would essentially do is provide a
"circular file", so when you get to the end of the file you start from
position 0. With the nice option that if you do roll over, you can
cle
Unfortunatly, I'm having trouble thinking off an easy way to do the
what I want, i.e. I want to specify a translator the way you say
above an always have the last 100M of log messages. So, the point
of my incorherence is that instead of the file rolling over, I just
want the file to
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
If program uses POSIX API, then there should be POSIX behaviour.
Meh, I was unclear. What I meant was that the translator can do
whatever it wants to the file offset. Aslong as read/write/whatever
work as expected.
One way to circumvent this is by declaring that this
30 matches
Mail list logo
